Skip to main content

A Tortured Artist//Haylee Lynd

    People talk often of the tortured artist and of how all great art comes from pain. While art can still be produced without suffering, art produced without suffering is likely to not be very good.  In chapter 18, we are given PAGES worth of description of Achille's shield, the artistry of none other than "the famous crippled Smith"(Homer 482) himself, Hephaestus, and he's gone through plenty of suffering... 

    Before creating Achille's shield, Hephaestus states that he wishes he could hide Achilles away from pain and death, and that he will do so by making armor for him "that any man in the world of men will marvel at through all the years to come-whoever sees it splendor." While Hephaestus favors Achilles because Achilles' mother, Thetis, saved his life, I cannot help but think, also, that Hephaestus pours himself into his shield, as well as the rest of his work, as a way to deal with his pain. 

    Hephaestus was rejected as a child because he "was a cripple"(Homer 480). His mother did not see beauty in him. He causes people to marvel and amaze at the beauty of his craftsmanship, at his art, because even his own mother could not see the beauty in his existence. 

    The suffering of three individual's is being poured into and is the cause of this great artwork: Hephaestus', Achilles', and Thetis'. Without the grief and rage of Achilles, there would be no need for this shield and armor. Without the pain felt by Thetis for her son, there would be no one owed a debt by the god, Hephaestus, to ask for the armor out of fear of losing her son if he were to go into battle without it. Finally, without the pain of Hephaestus, there would be no tortured artist to pour their pain and empathy of Achille's pain into the beautiful work of art that the shield became.


P.S. I commented on Ian Blair and Abigale Bell's posts.

Comments

  1. Hi Haylee! I really enjoyed reading your post! I totally agree with your idea of a tortured artist in Hephaestus. I can see metalwork as being his way of expressing to others all the beauty they could not see in him. Also, I think he might have been living through Achilles in a small way. He made this great shield, unmatched in workmanship, that would gain the most awe and respect. Awe and respect is something Hephaestus could never gain through battle like Achilles. I think this line of thinking follows yours in that Hephaestus put his all into this shield simply because he could not gain honor any other way.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with your statement about how art produced with little to no suffering tends to not be very good. I personally love music that tells a story with its tone and lyrics, and what better story than a tragedy? It only makes sense that I'd love music from tortured artists. The quality of the music is also affected because you can feel the raw emotion from the lyrics and the singer's voice and honestly, I live for that stuff.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...