Skip to main content

A Tortured Artist//Haylee Lynd

    People talk often of the tortured artist and of how all great art comes from pain. While art can still be produced without suffering, art produced without suffering is likely to not be very good.  In chapter 18, we are given PAGES worth of description of Achille's shield, the artistry of none other than "the famous crippled Smith"(Homer 482) himself, Hephaestus, and he's gone through plenty of suffering... 

    Before creating Achille's shield, Hephaestus states that he wishes he could hide Achilles away from pain and death, and that he will do so by making armor for him "that any man in the world of men will marvel at through all the years to come-whoever sees it splendor." While Hephaestus favors Achilles because Achilles' mother, Thetis, saved his life, I cannot help but think, also, that Hephaestus pours himself into his shield, as well as the rest of his work, as a way to deal with his pain. 

    Hephaestus was rejected as a child because he "was a cripple"(Homer 480). His mother did not see beauty in him. He causes people to marvel and amaze at the beauty of his craftsmanship, at his art, because even his own mother could not see the beauty in his existence. 

    The suffering of three individual's is being poured into and is the cause of this great artwork: Hephaestus', Achilles', and Thetis'. Without the grief and rage of Achilles, there would be no need for this shield and armor. Without the pain felt by Thetis for her son, there would be no one owed a debt by the god, Hephaestus, to ask for the armor out of fear of losing her son if he were to go into battle without it. Finally, without the pain of Hephaestus, there would be no tortured artist to pour their pain and empathy of Achille's pain into the beautiful work of art that the shield became.


P.S. I commented on Ian Blair and Abigale Bell's posts.

Comments

  1. Hi Haylee! I really enjoyed reading your post! I totally agree with your idea of a tortured artist in Hephaestus. I can see metalwork as being his way of expressing to others all the beauty they could not see in him. Also, I think he might have been living through Achilles in a small way. He made this great shield, unmatched in workmanship, that would gain the most awe and respect. Awe and respect is something Hephaestus could never gain through battle like Achilles. I think this line of thinking follows yours in that Hephaestus put his all into this shield simply because he could not gain honor any other way.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with your statement about how art produced with little to no suffering tends to not be very good. I personally love music that tells a story with its tone and lyrics, and what better story than a tragedy? It only makes sense that I'd love music from tortured artists. The quality of the music is also affected because you can feel the raw emotion from the lyrics and the singer's voice and honestly, I live for that stuff.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...