Skip to main content

Blasted Meddling gods // Ian Blair

    I don't think that the outcome of the Trojan War has surprised anyone so far. For one, the Achaeans outnumber the Trojans more than ten-to-one! Second, the Trojans have been pushed back to their city's shores, even up to their gates and inner walls by the time of book twenty-two. In such a desperate time for the city of Troy, it would make sense to try and either negotiate a surrender or challenge one of the Argives' champions to a duel with one of your best soldiers. Duels on the battlefield are not unheard-of, specifically in cultures that romanticized some form of honor or valor gained from dying in combat. Now do not misunderstand what I say, I am all for having Achilles and Hector dueling this conflict out between themselves so no more blood needs to be shed, but do the gods seriously have to involve themselves in everything?! Both Diomedes and Achilles have had kills taken out of their hands,  with Paris and Hector respectively, when they are whisked away by Apollo. In fact, Apollo saves Hector's life three different times; once while fighting Diomedes, second when fighting Ajax, and third when Hector initially engages Achilles in combat. Being bailed out by the gods should carry no honor, and it even strips the pair of princes of honor in my eyes. 

    Oh, and these are not the only occurrences of the gods intervening or meddling with the fights that are taking place. Scamander, the immortal who embodies the river that runs through the battlefield, ends up attacking Achilles and would have killed him with the help of his brother had Poseidon and Pallas Athena not intervened. Going back to earlier in the Iliad's text we can find examples of Ares joining the Trojan ranks and killing Argive men left and right, which he resumes when he engages Athena in combat (Homer 533). Zeus looked over the conflict for a significant amount of time, in which the Trojans were given glory and drove the Achaeans back to their ships, and none of these examples list how any of the times (roughly eleven) that Athena has interfered with the conflict. Athena's most notable interference was when she tricked Hector into believing that she was a dear brother of his, come to help his effort against Achilles. Hector's reaction when he realizes he was deceived gives us good insight into what could have been going through some of the other soldiers' minds as well: 

    "-yes and Hector knew the truth in his heart and the fighter cried aloud, 'My time has come! At last the gods have called me down to death. I thought he was at my side, the hero Deiphobus-he's safe inside the walls, Athena's tricked me blind. And now death, grim death is looming up beside me, no longer far away. No way to escape it now. This, this was their pleasure after all, sealed long ago-Zeus and the son of Zeus, the distant deadly Archer though often before now they rushed to my defense. So now I meet my doom. Well let me die-but not without struggle, not without glory, no, in some great clash of arms that even men to come will hear of down the years!'" (Homer 551). 

    After seeing the destruction and utter chaos that the gods caused on the battlefield, my personal opinion is that the gods should have stayed completely out of the war so that the fighters could settle the conflict in the best way for themselves. If the gods really were wise instead of rash-natured immortals, they would have recognized that the best approach was to have no approach at all; to simply stay on the sidelines. If the gods did want to intervene in the conflict, they should have acted as mediators between the nations, tens of thousands of lives could have been saved! In the end, the gods were fools to cause the war in the first place, but they were even greater fools to stay involved in what they would call "mortal affairs." Much like the movie War Games highlights in its storytelling, sometimes the best move is to not move at all.

P.S. I commented on Jamie's and Caroline's posts.

Comments

  1. I feel this. It’s like the gods are just as petty as the humans and they can’t not be involved in the affairs of man. If you don’t want to get involved in something, don’t get involved. How much easier can that be?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Agreed! If the gods hadn't got involved, the Acheans would have long ago overpowered the Trojans and won the war. Lives would be spared, and a time of peace would come sooner, but it's as if the gods cannot see that. They have such a need for favoritism.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...