Skip to main content

"Inside You There Are Two Wolves" - Hailey Morgan

The battle between darkness and light that Homer casually inserts into book 18 returns with full-force in book 22.

When Achilles and Hector finally battle against one another, the two men suddenly become representatives of both their nations and their personal values. In an almost Yin-Yang sort of relationship, Achilles and Hector mirror the night and day scenes of the past chapter. 

Achilles presents himself as a courageous warrior, seeking righteous revenge against the murderous Trojan, Hector. Though the enraged Achaen is the one chasing after a fair fight while Hector repeatedly attempts to flee, it becomes quickly evident after the Trojan's defeat that Achilles has totally abandoned all his morals. Defiling Hector's body by continually stabbing and dragging it across the battle, the once honorable warrior quickly losses all of his past virtue.

Hector, however, stands as the exact opposite of Achilles in this battle. Starting off as somewhat scared and cowardly, the Trojan finally gains enough courage to face the Achaen head-on. Defending himself against his adversary to save his honor, Hector battles valiantly.

This whole scenario vividly reminded me of that old "there are two wolves inside you" meme. So, naturally, I wasted a whole bunch of time and had my friend help me create a meme to more accurately depict what I'm talking about!

Edit - Replied to Abbie Hedden and Kaitlyn Terry. 


Comments

  1. I like that you wrote your blog about this, because I was really intrigued by those sections. They reminded me of that old classic, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, where the Dr. attempts to separate the good and bad in man but everything goes horribly wrong, yeah you've all read it. Achilles' actions are what reminded me of the novel. While I wish Hector portrayed Mr. Hyde because he literally hid most of the time, Achilles will do. Achilles started out with mostly sound intentions, seeking "righteous revenge" as you put it, he quickly devolves into an immoral monster, defiling Hector's body and continuously stabbing, much like the evil of Mr. Hyde. All in all I enjoyed your post!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

One shall stand, One shall fall // Ian Blair

      I usually have a little introduction into my thoughts about the reading for this week before I start with the actual blog part of my post, but I can't help but think about the bone-chilling realization that awaits us in Book VIII, so my introduction this time will be brief. It is my personal opinion that if people are imperfect, then we are only capable of imperfect systems and societies consequentially. However, this does not mean that we must not aim for the closest system to perfect that we can achieve.      The realization I wrote of earlier is the suggestion by Socrates that tyranny stems from the system we know as democracy. At first I disagreed, it is anarchism that causes  tyrannical reign as a byproduct of fulfilling its purpose of overthrowing the current power and not establishing another system. All anarchism does is create a power vacuum for another power to take over and the cycle repeats itself, right? ...Right? Quic...