Skip to main content

Interference of the gods - Kaitlyn Terry

There was a specific moment in Book 3 that held my mind captive as I continued to read, and that was Aphrodite's interference with the battle. She snatched Paris out of the jaws of death and set him in his home. She then goes to Helen, telling her to go to her husband as he is back from the war. I was shocked by Helen's boldness as she regarded the beautiful goddess as "Maddening One.." (Homer 141). Granted, the goddess reprimanded her, reminding Helen of her place. 

If Aphrodite had not intervened, the Trojan's would not have only lost Helen, but Paris as well. However, the war would have ceased and the onslaught of death would have ended. As much as I enjoyed the personality traits brought out by Aphrodite, her involvement seems to have only caused more problems and death.


p.s. I commented on Abigale and Caroline's

Comments

  1. I completely agree! The more I read about Aphrodite the more aggravated I get. She faces no consequences from her actions. I think that is what infuriates me the most. In these stories, the gods and goddesses make mistakes. This is to make them more relatable. However, they are not relatable because so far they have not faced and consequences of their actions.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...