Skip to main content

Oh Zeus.. SHE'S USING YOU // Jackson Riddle

    Lust. I find it amazing that a single, small word can carry so much depth and meaning for a society. This word drives many who may not understand this depth, and yet they allow it to be the driving force in much of their lives. Such behavior is often attributed to a man in pursuit of a woman; such is the case with Zeus in the Iliad in Chapter 14. The literal god of the sky and thunder, the ruler of Olympus, is so easily overtaken and deceived by Lust, an unseen yet immensely powerful force that takes his focus off of the battlefield and onto Hera.  
    I found it interesting how quickly Zeus fell into Hera's trap. To aid Poseidon on the battlefield, Hera takes advantage of the one charm she knows will be impossible to resist; you guessed it, Lust. And does Zeus pause to think about the possibility that Hera has ulterior motives? Nope. Not only does he do exactly what Hera wanted, he goes on to say that "Never has such a lust for goddess or mortal woman flooded my pounding heart and overwhelmed me so. Not even then, when I made love to Ixion's wife . . . not when I loved Acrisius' daughter Danae-marvelous ankles-" (Homer, 380). The guy is literally consumed by Lust! To list off all the affairs he has had, and then to say none compare to the love that "floods his pounding heart" at that moment... wow.
    What I'm getting at is this: sometimes the greatest weapon in a battle isn't a literal weapon. Hera knew that Lust was a huge weak spot for Zeus, and she exploited that weakness for her benefit in battle. Because Zeus was no longer watching over the war, Poseidon and the Achaeans are able to push back the Trojans and gain some ground. Often times wisdom out-weighs the weapon.

Edit: I commented on Hailey Morgan's post and Micah Powers' post.
    

Comments

  1. Hera didn't actually know about Poseidon's interference so she wasn't really helping him. She also uses one of Aphrodite's charm, not just her own... so is Zeus really falling to his "lusty emotions" or is he mind controlled? If I spike a rat's drinking water with cocaine, is he "impulsive" and a "drug-addict"? But i do agree that "wisdom CAN out-weigh the weapon" but Achilles would disagree with you as he kills everyone without any strategy other than "I'm better than all of you".

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's crazy to think that lust has been such a driving force for centuries -- it's nothing new. Often, I'll find it silly for someone to do something out of lust, yet the same actions are repeated over and over by completely different people. I mean, how many men, and women as well, in powerful positions have lost everything because they have fallen into the same trap that is lust?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lust isn't a bad thing in itself. Like everything it is bad in over usage and over doses. like eating sugar is good, but too much kills you and ruins your life. Lust at its core is the bodys' way of making sure we reproduce and don't roll over and commit suicide, lust can get you moving and chasing things like the guy or girl we have a crush on, that A+ class grade, i mean if you really want an A, a healthy relationship, and growing career it's usually from lust (desire for things). It's when we have too much of it and don't control it that it becomes an issue like anything else. Buddhism and The Tao (Dao) have some great koans (philosophical puzzles) about it but it's a bit much, so simply put: I like to remember that there are many sides to everything. That we as humans should see the beauty in things before we cast them off and search for the evil. Because even too much love is a dark, dark thing.... Anyone who had a clingy partner can tell ya that. (**insert laughter**)

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...