Skip to main content

One Size Fits All (But Not Really) /// Isabelle Ferguson

 Achilles’ armor is like a musician’s personal instrument. If you are a musician in possesion of an instrument you’ve played on for a while, you get it. For those of you who don’t, I’ll explain. You know your instrument (assuming you have practised). This piece of art is something you have practised on for hours out of the day. There is that one key that maybe needs to be pushed down with a bit more force so a note will speak. There’s one note that’s a bit sharp, so maybe you adjust your embouchure to ensure the note hits that perfect pitch. You adjust and your instrument adjusts so you fit each other. Your instrument is precious and familiar.

    Hector stole Achilles’ armor off of Patroclus (468), and decided a good idea would be to wear it into battle against the armor’s former wearer. First of all, I was not aware armor just fits everyone who picks it up now. Second, something I did not mention above, it takes time to assimilate yourself to a foreign instrument. You are not familiar with its sharp notes and bad keys. Achilles knows his armor like a musician knows their instrument. This is battle gear that has shielded him in many wars before this one. He knows its nooks and crannies. This is Hector’s ultimate downfall. Achilles knows something Hector does not- one spot is exposed (552). Sun Tzu said it best: “The oppurtunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.”

P.S. I commented on Jamie Peters and Haley Riddle's posts.

Comments

  1. You make a really good point, Isabelle. This is my 13th year of playing piano and I know the ins and outs of my piano. I never really thought about the comparison of armor to an instrument but it makes perfect sense. Also, I love the quote by Sun Tzu and when I watch shows with courtroom scenes, like Law and Order, the prosecutor or defense will look for an opening that the other gives.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I love your correlation between your instrument and a suit of armor. As romanticized of a thought that is, That connection portrays a beautiful picture I had not yet thought of. I think we can all agree that most guys even today would love having a suit of armor but I never really thought of armor as something you would become intimately familiar with. I think probably at that time men seemed to spend more time with/in their armor than in bed with their wife/wives, even though there seems to be an awful lot of that too. I think of the time I was working for my church back home, there was a camera that I used quite often and so I became intimately aware of the flaws of the camera from age as well as the features of the camera without really having to think about it.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...