Skip to main content

Pain or Pain?//Haylee Lynd

         For nine years, the Trojans and Acheans have fought, and while it is extremely clear that they want the war to end, war is still all Hector can think about. I find it ironic that Hector's son fears him. He recoils "cringing against his nurse's full breast, screaming out at the sight of his own father"(Homer 211) because of his armor. The boy fears the sight of his father dressed for war, a thing which in our time is feared because it brings about death. However, Hector is ready to face his fate, even if that be dying, and he prays that Zeus make his son strong and respected for the killing of the enemy in war. If it was me, I'd be daydreaming about peace and harmony. I would pray my son not have to fight the same as I, to experience the sight of blood in battle, and to leave this wife to fight.

    There's this dynamic created where you either bring dishonor and shame upon your family by not fighting and facing your fate in war, whether that be victory or death, or you bring fear and grief upon them by going into battle and facing death. The culture of honor and glory for men is a culture of pain and grief for their women and children. For instance, Hector's wife, along with her women, begin grieving the loss of her husband before he has even died in battle because she knows it is to come. Yet, if Hector would've chosen not to face his fate, there would still be pain bought upon the women for their worth is defined by that of their husband's. It really leads one to appreciate the culture change which has occurred that allows women to define their own worth today.


P.S. I commented on Jamie and Haley Riddle's posts.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...