Skip to main content

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania // Micah Powers

     In book three there is an interesting dynamic given to us between Hector and Paris. Hector comes to Paris to chastise him, challenge him and in some was it acted as exhortation. I picture it very much as the MCU (Marvel cinematic universe) placed Loki in Thor. There were many times where Thor would come raging in at Loki and Loki would cooly reply with a dialogue that ultimately achieved his goal.

     I have this beautiful image in my head of Hector storming into Paris's quarters fully decked in armor ("on a Thursday night"- I apologize for the Tiktok joke I couldn't resist.) to rage at Paris. Paris in his noble gowns, sipping a glass of wine, gazing at the battlefield, and cooling replying,

     "Oh you are quite right. I have been blessed. I guess I must tend to the futile problems of war." (then a bit more excitement) "...and get my woman!"  (summary of 70-92)

    Ultimately what I took from this was the power of brotherly love. I think of a Biblical brotherly relationship...the "Iron sharpens Iron" idea. As christian men we are called to keep one another accountable, to set an example, and to pull our brothers from temptation. Although Hector and Paris were definitely not christians (it wasn't really even possible for them to be), Hector showed a strong example of the brotherly love that we are called to. I love that he cut straight to the point of,

     "Look you done screwed up broski. Are you gonna let them think that you not only messed up, but also are a coward? Dude you are makings the Achaeans laugh out there. What happened to your strength?" (summary 43-68) 

    Above all else, it is amazing the power of one brother or sister in Christ coming to another and taking them by the hand to lift them from the dust. One of the most important things for Christians is keeping a level of concern (if you will) or accountability for one another so that, when we have tough times from depression or falling back into an addiction, there will be a hand to pull us out of the dirt and say let's keep moving on. 

I commented on Ian Blair's blog, Jamie Peter's blog, and Abigale Bell's blog. 

Comments

  1. There is a lot of truth in your assessment of Paris's and Hector's relationship. There seems to be a lot more effort from Hector's side of the relationship to better the other. He seems to constantly be standing up for Paris (620-626), possibly even to a fault. So far, the only motivator that Paris has responded to is his unwilling wife. Good observation!

    ReplyDelete
  2. As someone who has a sibling only a year and a half younger than me (Haley I'm talking about you here ;), I absolutely understand the sibling dynamic going on between Hector and Paris. I like what you said about Proverbs 27:17, how as iron sharpens iron, one man sharpens another. Paris was slow to act in response to the battle, and needed a stern Hector to challenge him and remind him of the task at hand. Well done!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...