Skip to main content

The Hard Pill To Swallow // Jessef Leslie

   "One death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic" (J. Stalin 1947). War... War is one of the most tragic events that can take place between men. Homer portrays this perfectly, In the Iliad, Homer doesn't say "oh and a couple thousand people died" he fleshes out each characters' death and describes cruel and gory casualties as well as the tragedy that each individual's spouse, father, and kids feel with each loss. " [...] The son of Tydeus killed the two of them on the spot, he ripped the dear life out of both and left their father tears and wrenching grief. Now he'd never welcome his two sons home from war, alive in the flesh, and distant kin would carve apart their birthright." (Homer, 169) He here shows us two characters that haven't been introduced to the story and shows us that this isn't just two young men dying. Their deaths also foreshadow a depressed father, a cursed bloodline, a widow, and a fatherless child.

  Homer shows us that the rewards of war are far outweighed by the casualties, like a feather being measured against a rock. While only a few heroes receive riches, masses of men will die fighting for a cause they don't believe in or care for in gruesome ways. "Just as Diomedes hefted a boulder into his hands, a tremendous feat- [...] flung it and struck Aeneas' thigh where the hipbone turns into the pelvis, the joint they call the cup- it smashed the socket, snapped both tendons too and the jagged rock tore back the skin in shreds." (Homer 174)

  


Comments: Ian Blair and Braylan Stringfellow

Comments

  1. Jessef, I think you really understood the point Homer was trying to convey. I forget where I heard it, but I remember someone saying "When you write about war, you don't write about bombs and armies. You write about a burnt sock on the road. You start in the small horror and extend from there." Homer really had a good balance between showing the innumerable masses and the personal horrors of war. You really highlighted that in your post!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

One shall stand, One shall fall // Ian Blair

      I usually have a little introduction into my thoughts about the reading for this week before I start with the actual blog part of my post, but I can't help but think about the bone-chilling realization that awaits us in Book VIII, so my introduction this time will be brief. It is my personal opinion that if people are imperfect, then we are only capable of imperfect systems and societies consequentially. However, this does not mean that we must not aim for the closest system to perfect that we can achieve.      The realization I wrote of earlier is the suggestion by Socrates that tyranny stems from the system we know as democracy. At first I disagreed, it is anarchism that causes  tyrannical reign as a byproduct of fulfilling its purpose of overthrowing the current power and not establishing another system. All anarchism does is create a power vacuum for another power to take over and the cycle repeats itself, right? ...Right? Quic...