Skip to main content

The Hard Pill To Swallow // Jessef Leslie

   "One death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic" (J. Stalin 1947). War... War is one of the most tragic events that can take place between men. Homer portrays this perfectly, In the Iliad, Homer doesn't say "oh and a couple thousand people died" he fleshes out each characters' death and describes cruel and gory casualties as well as the tragedy that each individual's spouse, father, and kids feel with each loss. " [...] The son of Tydeus killed the two of them on the spot, he ripped the dear life out of both and left their father tears and wrenching grief. Now he'd never welcome his two sons home from war, alive in the flesh, and distant kin would carve apart their birthright." (Homer, 169) He here shows us two characters that haven't been introduced to the story and shows us that this isn't just two young men dying. Their deaths also foreshadow a depressed father, a cursed bloodline, a widow, and a fatherless child.

  Homer shows us that the rewards of war are far outweighed by the casualties, like a feather being measured against a rock. While only a few heroes receive riches, masses of men will die fighting for a cause they don't believe in or care for in gruesome ways. "Just as Diomedes hefted a boulder into his hands, a tremendous feat- [...] flung it and struck Aeneas' thigh where the hipbone turns into the pelvis, the joint they call the cup- it smashed the socket, snapped both tendons too and the jagged rock tore back the skin in shreds." (Homer 174)

  


Comments: Ian Blair and Braylan Stringfellow

Comments

  1. Jessef, I think you really understood the point Homer was trying to convey. I forget where I heard it, but I remember someone saying "When you write about war, you don't write about bombs and armies. You write about a burnt sock on the road. You start in the small horror and extend from there." Homer really had a good balance between showing the innumerable masses and the personal horrors of war. You really highlighted that in your post!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...