Skip to main content

The Power of One Man // Jessef Leslie

  Throughout the Iliad the battle is focused down to fights between leaders and great fighters. Homer writes about how one important figure kills another over and over again to show how the war unfolds. Something he continues to highlight are warriors who shift the tides' of battle single-handedly: fighters like Hector, Diomedes, Achilles, etc. Who if they die the war will shift completely. Every time Hector was knocked down in earlier books we see the Trojans rush to save him, because if he falls the war is lost. In book 20 we see this huge change in the book as the Acheaens flip the tables' of war. "But all the while the rest of the Trojans fled en masse, thrilled to reach the ramparts, crowding, swarming in, no daring left remain outside the city walls and wait for each other, learn who made it through, who died in battle- [...]"(Homer 540) The death of Patroclus and appearance of Achilles swings the fight drastically,  as Achilles the swift-footed charges through Trojans like a dolphin herding a school of fish; Even the war cry of the son of Peleus causes Trojans to die before he enters the battle. "Three times the Trojans and famous allied whirled in panic- and twelve of their finest fighters died then and there, crushed by chariots, impaled on their own spears." (Homer 475) 

  In conclusion, when we think of war we often associate the larger army as the winner. The Acheaens had the Trojans out numbered 10:1 so we'd expect them to trample through them. But they instead are losing the fight and pushed back to their ships because they are down one warrior, though he be god-like, the fact still remains that Homer is putting a lot emphasis on the power of an individual to cause destruction and bring about order and glory through Achilles/ Patroclus and Paris/ Hector... With the help of a few gods of course.



Comments: Logan Turner and Jackson Riddle

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...