Skip to main content

The Power of One Man // Jessef Leslie

  Throughout the Iliad the battle is focused down to fights between leaders and great fighters. Homer writes about how one important figure kills another over and over again to show how the war unfolds. Something he continues to highlight are warriors who shift the tides' of battle single-handedly: fighters like Hector, Diomedes, Achilles, etc. Who if they die the war will shift completely. Every time Hector was knocked down in earlier books we see the Trojans rush to save him, because if he falls the war is lost. In book 20 we see this huge change in the book as the Acheaens flip the tables' of war. "But all the while the rest of the Trojans fled en masse, thrilled to reach the ramparts, crowding, swarming in, no daring left remain outside the city walls and wait for each other, learn who made it through, who died in battle- [...]"(Homer 540) The death of Patroclus and appearance of Achilles swings the fight drastically,  as Achilles the swift-footed charges through Trojans like a dolphin herding a school of fish; Even the war cry of the son of Peleus causes Trojans to die before he enters the battle. "Three times the Trojans and famous allied whirled in panic- and twelve of their finest fighters died then and there, crushed by chariots, impaled on their own spears." (Homer 475) 

  In conclusion, when we think of war we often associate the larger army as the winner. The Acheaens had the Trojans out numbered 10:1 so we'd expect them to trample through them. But they instead are losing the fight and pushed back to their ships because they are down one warrior, though he be god-like, the fact still remains that Homer is putting a lot emphasis on the power of an individual to cause destruction and bring about order and glory through Achilles/ Patroclus and Paris/ Hector... With the help of a few gods of course.



Comments: Logan Turner and Jackson Riddle

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.
4 comments
Read more

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....
5 comments
Read more

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...
7 comments
Read more