Skip to main content

Who's Pulling the Strings Here?- Rachael Gregson


 The war and its wounds run deeper than we think. I mean, yes, we are reading about the feud between the Trojans and the Greeks, but the opposing side is really not portrayed in a way that opposing sides are usually written. They are written as people, the same as the Greeks, and the real war being between the gods and acted through mortals as their puppets. This can be seen in how the two armies go about fighting; it gets to a point where they are so desperate to stop the fighting that they don't even have a preference as to who wins anymore. They just absentmindedly declare a truce and pray that the side in the wrong would be killed and their women raped if cease-fire ends-whoever that is meant to be. When conflict does resume once more, both sides suffer terribly. Both sides by the end of it also seem to lack emotion, as if a force bigger than themselves has all the strings pulled. Pandarus fires toward Menelaus only because of Athena's influence, and no ones makes decisions solely based off their judgments, just like Helen goes back to bed with Paris only because of her fear of a goddess. If you look closer, the war isn't even between men.It's between the gods. They are the only ones taking pleasure out of the war, and it's something that Hera and Athena can hide behind to settle things with Zeus. It's just unfortunate that the humans serve as their pawns. 

I commented on posts by Jamie and Ian. 

Comments

  1. ClaboAugust 24, 2020 at 4:12 PM

    I completely agree with you and had the exact same thoughts as I was reading through the books. It seems as if the gods are more invested in the wars than the Greeks and Trojans. Maybe its because of their immortality and they are just trying to find a way to entertain themselves at the expense of the people. It is very unfortunate for the humans, but that is what happens when you live in a world where the gods are mostly self-serving.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hailey MorganAugust 24, 2020 at 4:29 PM

    Homer definitely emphasizes the inherent humanity of the warriors on both sides of the battle. In fact, when reading, it quickly becomes almost impossible to pick a favorite between the Achaeans and the Trojans since neither is truly represented as being the enemy.

    Because both armies are essentially under the control of the gods, choosing a side to root for becomes ultimately tied to which deity you would prefer to win the war.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.
4 comments
Read more

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....
5 comments
Read more

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...
7 comments
Read more