Skip to main content

Ever Heard of it Being Too Soon? - Kaitlyn Terry

The entirety of Pericles' speech seems to be a massive call to action. He is essentially telling the men who will fight to fight for death in glory, not for a life in shame. However, the timing seems a little odd, as he is giving this speech at a funeral for the recently deceased warriors. If any speech seemed to be "too soon" it would most likely be this one. These men have just recently died and their families are still grieving but Pericles is standing up and telling the people to sacrifice their lives for glory. Don't get me wrong, I see where he is coming from and I know he means well, he even addresses the families, but it just seems to be too soon. These families are at the funeral for closure, not a call to action. He even tells the parents that if they can, they should have more children to distract them from the loss. It just seems like the wrong time, wrong place. This speech would have been great as the men were preparing for the next battle, but perhaps a speech on the gains that Athens received due to the courage and sacrifice of these men would have been more appropriate for the occasion. 

Additionally, not only is he addressing the families, but he is addressing the surviving warriors. Imagine how it would feel to attend the funeral of a comrade, only to hear about how its better to die in glory than to survive and live on with less glory. It would be humiliating to stand there and hear how shameful it is for you to have survived your comrades. I understand how it could also be inspiring, but no one goes to a funeral expecting to hear something along those lines.


ps I commented on Haylee Lynd and Caroline Tucker's posts

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

One shall stand, One shall fall // Ian Blair

      I usually have a little introduction into my thoughts about the reading for this week before I start with the actual blog part of my post, but I can't help but think about the bone-chilling realization that awaits us in Book VIII, so my introduction this time will be brief. It is my personal opinion that if people are imperfect, then we are only capable of imperfect systems and societies consequentially. However, this does not mean that we must not aim for the closest system to perfect that we can achieve.      The realization I wrote of earlier is the suggestion by Socrates that tyranny stems from the system we know as democracy. At first I disagreed, it is anarchism that causes  tyrannical reign as a byproduct of fulfilling its purpose of overthrowing the current power and not establishing another system. All anarchism does is create a power vacuum for another power to take over and the cycle repeats itself, right? ...Right? Quic...
1 comment
Read more