Skip to main content

Furies Are Feminists//Haylee Lynd

    In Ancient Greece, women were viewed as lesser than men. You didn't need me to tell you that. You can see it in their everyday lives. Even the gods agree that women are lesser. However, in Aeschylus' The Eumenides, it appears the Furies don't agree with that point of view, at least when it comes to mothers. 

    In Orestes trial, the Furies argue that Orestes murder of his mother was wrong because he was of her own blood. The leader of the Furies states, "She gave you life(Aeschylus 258)." This statement places a high value on women, a higher value than most Greeks placed on women. The Furies' argument places men and women as equals. In contrast, Orestes, Apollo, and Athena argue that men's lives are worth more than women's. Orestes, as a male, values his father's life over his mother's. Similarly, Apollo states, "The woman you call the mother of the child is not the parent, just a nurse to the seed, the new-sown seed that grows and dwells inside her. The man is the source of life-the one who mounts...The father can father forth without a mother...(260-261) In other words, Apollo states that the mother merely acts a pot for the seed to grow in, and after the child is born, the father no longer needs the mother to raise his child. I find this particularly interesting as the women were in charge of domestic and private life, while the men were in charge of the public life. In Ancient Greek, it was customary that the women take care of the children as they were at home. Wouldn't the man not have time to properly care for the children since he was to be out working, fighting, and voting? 

    Apollo continues his argument that men are greater by giving the story of Athena's birth; she was sprung completely from the Greek god Zeus. Athena argues this same point. She states, "No mother gave me birth. I honour the male...(264)" Thus, she agrees that men are greater than women. I found this to be particularly surprising as Athena is a female. It shows how the Greeks created their gods to have the same beliefs as themselves, although Furies did not. The female Furies believe strongly in equality. The most important thing to the Furies is justice; the value placed on each gender does not change how they dole justice out. 

    I sympathize with Orestes and can see why he killed his mother. She murdered his father, and in to maintain honor, Orestes, as an Ancient Greek, was obligated to avenge his father's death. I find it frustrating however, as a women in the 21st century, that the strongest argument used for the justification of Clymenestra's death was that women are lesser than men.


P.S. I commented on Ian's and Jamie's posts.

Comments

  1. Hi Haylee! I really enjoyed reading your post! I totally agree with the ideas you brought out here. In today's world, we definitley have a different view of women than the Ancient Greeks! This being said, I was surprised to realize that this play touches so often on the topic of feminism. The majority of the roles (including leading roles) are women. I would expect a culture who looks down on women to make the main roles in their plays men. Not only this, but in the story itself, I would expect Orestes to win the trial with Apollo's help. Instead, the only reason he survives is that Athena cast her vote in his favor. Athena, the goddess?!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am very impressed with your reasoning, Haylee. It is very annoying that women are so belittled in the ancient world, and there are more ways than just what you have mentioned in your post. The Furies are of the female gender themselves; is it not intriguing that their power was stripped away by a goddess who regards males as superior to females? They were still honored afterwards for their services and given power over civil wars, but in a way, even that power is still stereotypical of women.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I was completely appalled with the way that Apollo regarded Clytemnestra, and I think the way he worded things could have and should have been from an objective point of view. I can however see why Apollo would think less of women, his feud with his sister Artemis being what it was, but only a fool holds uses a personal grudge to discriminate against an entire population. I readily anticipated Athena or one of the furies to verbally rip him to shreds and Orestes' defense along with him, but that moment never came! Here is the goddess of cunning and wisdom, and she does not defend those that are closer to her than other immortal gods?! If an idea or solution can be formed from any mind, then why limit what the mind of someone is capable of by restricting access to education or anything else in society simply because of their,..shall I say physical variation? Regardless, the gods should understand their places of power and influence the people who look up to them to be better than this.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh wow, I was so focused on the drama of this family that I never even realized the male/female dynamics. To me, this twisted view goes completely against humanity. The original role of the female back then was to be at home and rear the children. To say she was not included in the growth is insulting and concerning. A child needs both father and mother.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...