Skip to main content

Socrates and Piano Notes-Rachael Gregson

 


While Books I and II had Socrates and his travel companions going back and forth about the definition of justice, it was a breath of fresh air to read in Books III and IV about how they wanted to permeate justice and regulations in literally everything-from sports to music. This type of society-building that Socrates presented was unheard at the time-the belief that bettering the virtue in an individual positively advanced the virtue in the community as a whole and that change needed to start in the people's everyday activities. What people find pleasure and joy in says a lot about their character; how they go about that certain activity says further. Even what's enjoyable should be taken into moderation and key, because in Socrates's eyes, the line between 'healthy' and 'excessive' could be blurred very quickly. Games, music, and the arts were luxuries that if dabbled in long enough, could degrade the integrity of the guardians. It reminded me a lot about what C.S. Lewis wrote on sin. He compared it to piano notes. He writes, "Strictly speaking, there are no such thing as good and bad impulses. Think once again of a piano. It has not got two kinds on it, the 'right' notes and the 'wrong' ones. Every single note is right at one time and wrong at another". Sin isn't always 'bad' things. Sometimes, sin can be things intended for good done for the wrong reasons or at the wrong time. So is the case with the common things that Socrates is trying to moralize in his society. He's not being a nay-sayer about games, music, and arts. He just doesn't want something good to become something bad, and he urges his companions to keep tabs on their excess. Now I do NOT believe in censorship most cases, but that's a whole other post to itself, I believe. I'm mainly just focusing on the positives of Books III and IV. 

What do you think? 

I commented on posts by Jacob Clabo and Lily Caswell.

Comments

  1. ClaboSeptember 28, 2020 at 11:26 PM

    I definitely agree with your post in that the intentions of the republic would be truly remarkable if they were able to pull it all off. However, I just feel as if the life in the "just city" would be very oppressive and dreadful after a bit of time. I feel as if it would only be a life of restraint.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Haley RiddleSeptember 29, 2020 at 11:07 PM

      I agree that it would become oppressive. I do like your attempt to highlight the good, however, because it really does seem like a good idea that if acted on correctly could produce good results.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.
4 comments
Read more

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....
5 comments
Read more

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...
7 comments
Read more