Skip to main content

Socrates and Piano Notes-Rachael Gregson

 


While Books I and II had Socrates and his travel companions going back and forth about the definition of justice, it was a breath of fresh air to read in Books III and IV about how they wanted to permeate justice and regulations in literally everything-from sports to music. This type of society-building that Socrates presented was unheard at the time-the belief that bettering the virtue in an individual positively advanced the virtue in the community as a whole and that change needed to start in the people's everyday activities. What people find pleasure and joy in says a lot about their character; how they go about that certain activity says further. Even what's enjoyable should be taken into moderation and key, because in Socrates's eyes, the line between 'healthy' and 'excessive' could be blurred very quickly. Games, music, and the arts were luxuries that if dabbled in long enough, could degrade the integrity of the guardians. It reminded me a lot about what C.S. Lewis wrote on sin. He compared it to piano notes. He writes, "Strictly speaking, there are no such thing as good and bad impulses. Think once again of a piano. It has not got two kinds on it, the 'right' notes and the 'wrong' ones. Every single note is right at one time and wrong at another". Sin isn't always 'bad' things. Sometimes, sin can be things intended for good done for the wrong reasons or at the wrong time. So is the case with the common things that Socrates is trying to moralize in his society. He's not being a nay-sayer about games, music, and arts. He just doesn't want something good to become something bad, and he urges his companions to keep tabs on their excess. Now I do NOT believe in censorship most cases, but that's a whole other post to itself, I believe. I'm mainly just focusing on the positives of Books III and IV. 

What do you think? 

I commented on posts by Jacob Clabo and Lily Caswell.

Comments

  1. ClaboSeptember 28, 2020 at 11:26 PM

    I definitely agree with your post in that the intentions of the republic would be truly remarkable if they were able to pull it all off. However, I just feel as if the life in the "just city" would be very oppressive and dreadful after a bit of time. I feel as if it would only be a life of restraint.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Haley RiddleSeptember 29, 2020 at 11:07 PM

      I agree that it would become oppressive. I do like your attempt to highlight the good, however, because it really does seem like a good idea that if acted on correctly could produce good results.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

One shall stand, One shall fall // Ian Blair

      I usually have a little introduction into my thoughts about the reading for this week before I start with the actual blog part of my post, but I can't help but think about the bone-chilling realization that awaits us in Book VIII, so my introduction this time will be brief. It is my personal opinion that if people are imperfect, then we are only capable of imperfect systems and societies consequentially. However, this does not mean that we must not aim for the closest system to perfect that we can achieve.      The realization I wrote of earlier is the suggestion by Socrates that tyranny stems from the system we know as democracy. At first I disagreed, it is anarchism that causes  tyrannical reign as a byproduct of fulfilling its purpose of overthrowing the current power and not establishing another system. All anarchism does is create a power vacuum for another power to take over and the cycle repeats itself, right? ...Right? Quic...
1 comment
Read more