Skip to main content

The Impact of Death - Caroline Tucker

Hector’s death.
An event that impacts more than just Hector himself.
Hector’s death impacts his family and his city.

Hector’s death leads to the grieving of the entire city of Troy. Interestingly, Andromache is the one who leads the women into mourning. Both times Andromache mourns, the women of Troy join her in her grief. It intrigued me that Andromache has the influence to lead Troy’s women to mourning. In book six, after her monologue of grief  “Her voice rang out in tears and the women wailed in answer.” (Homer 558). In book 24, she does not have the majority of the influence in the grief. However, I believe her speech of grief was very moving to the people of Troy.

Another impact of Hector’s death that intrigued me was the impact it had on Andromache and their son. Now that hector is dead, Andromache states “I cannot think he will ever come to manhood. / Long before that the city will be sacked” (612). She mentions that now her son will never grow up before Troy is destroyed and plundered. Now that Hector, the “great guardian” of Troy, is dead Andromache believes that Troy will fall (612).

By the end of the Iliad no one in Troy has a glimmer of hope. They cannot count on the gods or their bravest and most valiant warrior. The more I see how little hope every person in the book has the more grateful I am for the God that I believe in. The city of Troy lost hope when their leader died. Because of my leader’s death, I have hope. Who knew that reading the Iliad would remind me of the amazing hope I have because of Jesus’s death. 

P.s. I commented on Clabo’s and Haylee Lynd’s.



Comments

  1. Before reading your blog, I had not thought of how their versions of the gods might affect their hope. I mean, how do you put your hope in gods that are just as messed up, if not more, than you are? I see they still are able to pray to them and have a few of their problems solved, but it truly does make one appreciate the hope which we can have because of our God. He is steadfast. He is constant. He is loving. I would hate to have to go through such pain as the people of Troy, or even of Achilles, without my God.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

One shall stand, One shall fall // Ian Blair

      I usually have a little introduction into my thoughts about the reading for this week before I start with the actual blog part of my post, but I can't help but think about the bone-chilling realization that awaits us in Book VIII, so my introduction this time will be brief. It is my personal opinion that if people are imperfect, then we are only capable of imperfect systems and societies consequentially. However, this does not mean that we must not aim for the closest system to perfect that we can achieve.      The realization I wrote of earlier is the suggestion by Socrates that tyranny stems from the system we know as democracy. At first I disagreed, it is anarchism that causes  tyrannical reign as a byproduct of fulfilling its purpose of overthrowing the current power and not establishing another system. All anarchism does is create a power vacuum for another power to take over and the cycle repeats itself, right? ...Right? Quic...