Skip to main content

The Perfect Officer // Jessef Leslie

  Security within a community is very crucial to its survival and growth. Without protectors, invaders, crime, desire would plague almost any city. So, how do we create protectors of a community, especially those who won't abuse the powers they will have? In The Republic by Plato, Socrates and Glaucon discuss the important of some sort of internal police force that they called guardians or auxiliaries. They first discuss that it starts at a young age (the teaching of a guardian) with the music they listen to, stories they are told, and activities they partake in. "... Then we shall do well to delete the lamentations of famous men... We do this so that those who we educate to be guardians of the city will disdain such behavior."   (Plato 84) Here he shows how Homer and other playwrights have made the gods and even warriors seem lustful, deceptive, and wicked. Though I believe Aristotle is right in saying we all should have some in us, the fact Socrates is making still stands. Even in modern day America we rarely filter everything our children grow up watching and listening to. Kids are stealing, fighting, cursing, and much more t the earliest of ages and we say "oh they're just kids". I belief limiting and filtering what children are exposed to and even directing a bit of their path will help them lived more flourishing lives. The large importance of this on raising an officer is that an officer will be in charge of defending his people and having their lives in his hands. Such a person shouldn't have curiosities on what is just and unjust nor ponder whether their life has no value. 

  Secondly, They must have strong ideas of what justice is and believe it to be objective even though it may be subjective for the safety of their citizens. One of my personal beliefs is that they should be well trained in hand-to-hand combat and grappling so that they are comfortable with scrapping and don't have to resort to a gun to early out of fear. Also, that they should look at the community as their own family the community should feel the same of them. Socrates tackles this point in a very interesting way at the end of book 3 in The Republic. He tackles the ideas of how we can guarantee the connection between civilian and guardian will be made. As well as how we can ensure our guardians to be good and not stained by dark childhoods and upbringings." In the first place, none must posses private property, excepting only what is indispensable. Second, their habitations and storage places shall be open to all who care to enter. They will receive their food from the other citizens in quantities appropriate for warrior-athletes who are brave and temperate... They will live together and eat their meals in common. Gold and silver we shall tell them, they have already in their souls in divine measure from the gods. They have no need for human metals... This way of life will make them saviors of the state and of themselves." (Plato 115).


I commented on Hailey Riddle and Micah Powers post. (My comments are late)

Comments

  1. The idea of a security/defense force that is universally accepted and praised by the city is reminiscent of how people would treat certain super heroes such as Superman or Wonder Woman in the Justice League animated series; they would always garner praise and attention from everyone that was in the area whenever they were out in public for any reason. On the flip side of this, I think Socrates' idea of training guardians from birth by controlling what the inputs given to them is almost like what Hitler was trying to accomplish under the Nazi regime when the education facilities started teaching a dark, twisted version of history that made the rest of the world seem evil. Instead of utopian, the idea almost sounds totalitarian!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...