Skip to main content

Absolutely happiness corrupts absolutely.../// Micah V. Powers

    I think I got that wrong...Absolute power corrupts absolutely. That phrase is a phrase seemingly instilled in every American yet Plato seems to change that phrase throughout the creation so to speak of this city of his. Humans, well more over being human automatically attaches you to this trait of Constantly seeking comfort, pleasure, desire in summary happiness. As Christians we know much of this is bound up in sin nature, but we fail to recognize so often that the reason sin nature is so prevalent is because we are inherently created to worship something. For the vast majority of non-believers and even Christ seekers that thing that we choose to worship is personal happiness. "

    "My friend, you have forgotten again that the law is concerned not with the happiness of any particular class in the city but with happiness the city as a whole" (Plato, 519e) 

This is what I believe should be the use of laws although not for the general happiness of the populous but the general safety of the populous. Plato is correct here in placing the laws in the context of the good of the whole unfortunately it fails to recognize the consistent quest for contentment. For the most part the law bearers and bringers within this "Ideal city" would seek to bring the truth from the peak into the context of the cave but instinctively the very same would end up imparting regulations intended for their own benefit.  It would be as inevitable as Thanos's snap. We see this in the context of today in the insanely outrageous salaries which our major public officials rewards themselves with, not to mention the way their power is used to collect funds from big businesses to do their bidding. Now we are back to absolute powers corrupts absolutely. Where was I going? Oh yeah, Personal pleasure is always pedestaled above popular protection. Platos point of keeping the Personal happiness out of government resonates well with me but his use of the word happiness concerns me. I don't think it is the job of any government to make its citizens happy. (Smol rant coming) I think the majority of the problem with the laws in the endless law book of the United States of America is that much of the laws seek to bring pleasure to one of the parties related to whatever the topic is. The government should not seek the happiness of the people. The government should seek to protect the dignity of all citizens. This dignity is guarded via laws that protect a citizens life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. The fundamental difference between America's ideal city and Plato's ideal city is it being the responsibility of the citizens to pursue happiness versus the right of the government to find your happiness. 


P.S. I commented on Abbie Hedden and Braylan Stringfellow's Blogs.

Comments

  1. Your point that the laws of a society are not for the happiness but the safety of the populace is probably the best point any legislature can make in justifying its existence. In certain systems, certain compromises must be made in order to achieve universal peace, or however close we can get to it.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Word Painting in Vesta—Lily Caswell

  Word painting in Weelkes’s As Vesta Was from Latmos Hill Descending is quite interesting. And because that is a really long title, I’m calling it Vesta from now on. Word painting is basically when the melody matches up with the lyrics. So in Vesta, when it says “ascending” and “descending”, there are obviously scales going up and down. The madrigal was written for six voices to sing unaccompanied, so when they start to come together, it matches with the lyrics; so if the lyric says “two by two”, there are only two voices; “three by three” there is another voice added, and so forth. All the parts combine in exclamation before Vesta before it is left “all alone” to the highest soprano. All the way to the end of the piece, word painting continues when shouts of “Long live fair Oriana” with the bass sustaining long notes. Word painting in and of itself is a highly interesting topic because a musician takes the words of a poem or a sonnet and writes a melody line that pertains to cer...

Welcome to Honors! (Please Read This)

     Welcome to Honors! My name is Abbie Hedden and I serve as President of Honors. Jamie Peters is our Vice President, and Caroline Tucker is our Secretary. I look forward to getting to know all of you in class during this upcoming year! There are a few things you need to know about Honors.      There are no quizzes or tests in Honors. Grades are provided based on attendance/class participation, blogs, explication papers, and the research paper. The papers will be addressed at a later date, as they aren't due until later in the semester. However, there is a blog post due every week. Bearing that in mind, here are the requirements! Criteria Blog posts are due Monday at 11:59PM , and comments are due Tuesday at 9:29AM . DO NOT BE LATE ON ASSIGNMENTS. Points WILL be deducted from late assignments! Be sure to have your name in your Blogger profile Blog posts should include at least one to two paragraphs on that week’s reading assignment.  Blog posts shoul...

Topsy Turvy Day—Lily Caswell

  I cannot remember how old I was when I watched T he Hunchback of Notre Dame  but I was at least 8 or 9. I didn’t realize until probably a couple of years ago that the song  “Topsy Turvy” and the corresponding event was actually based on a real festival. The Feast of Fools was usually held on January 1 though it could have also been held on the 6 th  or the 13 th  of January. It was portrayed as a parody of Catholic feasts. Church bells were rung improperly, songs were sung out of tune, and the celebrants “wore strange garments and masks, and used puddings, sausages, and old shoes as censers.” (Seaton, p 77) In the song “Topsy Turvy”, it says “It’s the day the devil in us gets released / It’s the day we mock the prig and shock the priest / Everything is Topsy Turvy at the Feast of Fools… And it’s the day we do the things that we deplore ‘ On the other three hundred and sixty-four.”  I commented on Haylee Lynd’s and Jamie’s posts. Sources: https://www.brita...