Skip to main content

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable way to be in today's society. We look at peaceful protestors with more respect than we do at those who fight back against the violence they face either from the public or from law enforcement. For example, we view Martin Luther King's approach to the Civil Rights Movement in high esteem. 

     However, I cannot say that I entirely disagree with Aristotle in that anger needs be expressed "in the right way, at the right time, or with the right persons" (41). These qualifications are greatly important, and I wish Aristotle would have expanded on them, although following Jesus' teachings, I would have likely disagreed with some of Aristotle's descriptions for those qualifications. I aspire to "turn the other cheek" when wrong is done to myself, but when wrong is done to my friends, I aspire to defend them. Part of this stems from my beliefs. I aspire to be like Jesus although I fail in this endeavor far more than I succeed. The other part, in all honesty, is due to fear. I am a passive person because I fear making the person who has done me wrong angry or upset, which can sometimes lead to more wrong done to me. Thus, there is a constant struggle of not having wrong done to me because I choose not to defend myself due to my beliefs or due to fear(with the former being honorable and the latter not so much) or defending myself and disobeying Jesus' commands.


P.S. I commented on Hailey's and Isabelle's posts.

Comments

  1. It doesn't surprise me that is some area Aristotle and Jesus would disagree. I was kind of expecting it. In all honesty though, anger is something that can be very hard to control. What Aristotle is saying about anger though is only human nature. We want to retaliate.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jesus' character especially challenges me when it comes to anger. I always wonder how he was able to take the insults and attacks. If my brother insults me, I really have to bite my tongue to keep myself from retaliating, and most times I say something. By the way, I mean my younger brother, not Jackson.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

One shall stand, One shall fall // Ian Blair

      I usually have a little introduction into my thoughts about the reading for this week before I start with the actual blog part of my post, but I can't help but think about the bone-chilling realization that awaits us in Book VIII, so my introduction this time will be brief. It is my personal opinion that if people are imperfect, then we are only capable of imperfect systems and societies consequentially. However, this does not mean that we must not aim for the closest system to perfect that we can achieve.      The realization I wrote of earlier is the suggestion by Socrates that tyranny stems from the system we know as democracy. At first I disagreed, it is anarchism that causes  tyrannical reign as a byproduct of fulfilling its purpose of overthrowing the current power and not establishing another system. All anarchism does is create a power vacuum for another power to take over and the cycle repeats itself, right? ...Right? Quic...