Skip to main content

But... but but… Poetry?

While I am completely able to see Socrates's reasons for choosing to banish the poets from the just city, it doesn't mean that I like his decision. His reasoning and logic make sense, but after years of reading and listening to great poetry that can teach virtue and positive characteristics, it is just painful to see him cast this artistic group aside. Sadly, however, it seems one can have no imperfection within the perfect city. Ironically enough, that statement leads to my next question.

If everyone else is expected to act without fault and not allow a single iota of corruption into the just city, why is it that the poets are unable to do this? Is poetry naturally unjust in Socrates's eyes? If writers and musicians can make their art with the same emotion and feeling that a poet would and still allow their art to be censored by the state if needed, why couldn't the poets do the same? 

Now, there may be something I'm missing or just something I didn't pick up on, but I am confused about this subject.

Would anyone like to enlighten me or just share their opinion on the matter? 

P.S. I commented on Caroline Tucker's and Abigale Bell's posts.  

Comments

  1. Ian BlairOctober 15, 2020 at 1:04 PM

    As someone very versed in the performing arts, I feel as though we are storytellers at the core of what we do. Think about theater production or music, the words and lines written are done so with a deeper meaning in mind for the audience to decipher. If poets are not allowed, then neither is creative expression. People need creative outlets to express themselves or they would just be robotic drones.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.
4 comments
Read more

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....
5 comments
Read more

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...
7 comments
Read more