Skip to main content

How Relative Can We Get? - Clabo

Honestly, Aristotle's "Doctrine of the Mean" was probably one of my favorite sections while I was in Philosophy 101. The problem is, however, who is to determine the middle ground between the two extremes. Who is to determine the said specific mean? While some cultures and societies may thrive on the extremes of excessive boastfulness and find nothing wrong with it, others may live in a completely self-depreciative society. They could both look at each other and find the other detestable, but who is to determine where the lines are drawn. 

I happen to think that there isn't a true mean or exact middle point of described characteristics between two extremes, but rather I think it is more a set of loose boundaries that encompass the middle ground. One temperament and characteristic cannot solely fit every single situation. I feel as if practice and experience help someone guide their way through social encounters. It may not be a set standard, but rather a game of push and pull between the two extremes.  

What are your thoughts? 

P.S. I commented on Haley Riddle's and Jackson Riddle's posts. 

Comments

  1. Jackson RiddleOctober 27, 2020 at 12:09 AM

    I like your perspective on this! I too believe that each characteristic is unique in the boundaries that determine its limits; but, as you said, there must be someone who draws that line between beneficial honesty, for example, and brutal honesty. I believe that each culture grows in its values over time, deciding as a community what those boundaries should be, expanding into a democracy over time. And yes, practice and experience are crucial components of the decision. One cannot understand what it means to be proud or humble if they have never experienced such behavior.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Lily CaswellOctober 27, 2020 at 7:49 AM

    I had the same question, Clabo. Who decides what the medium between two extremes is and how is the medium defined? I like the way Jackson put it in his comment that the community decides the boundary.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.
4 comments
Read more

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....
5 comments
Read more

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...
7 comments
Read more