Skip to main content

I Feel Personally Attacked, Aristotle - Hailey Morgan

I wasn't expecting to be so personally attacked by our reading this week? I mean seriously, why did Aristotle gotta do me like that? 

Anyways, when the philosopher began speaking about magnanimity and knowing one's worth, I felt slightly uncomfy. I typically tend to lean more towards the underestimation side, but Aristotle seems to see this quality as being just as unethical as being conceited. He calls this trait "pusillanimous" and, apparently, it is worse than conceit. Well, wonderful. Guess my self-deprecation jokes aren't as funny as I thought.

Speaking of self-deprecation, this quality can also be found at the farthest end of the truthfulness/sincerity spectrum. With self-deprecation and irnony at the lowest point on the graph and boastfulness at the top, I suppose I am destined to constantly reside at the bottom of the pile. Oops! Wait, that joke was both self-depricating and ironic . . . Gosh, this is going to be difficult to fix!

Setting the humor aside, I really do find it strange how Aristotle labels these traits as unethical. While I would agree they are not the best mental heath boosters, I wouldn't go to the extreme of saying that people who underestimate themselves or have gloomy senses of important are unethically sound. Sure, they may be depressed, but aren't we all?

P.S. For legal reasons, these are all jokes.

Edit - Replied to Ian Blair and Rachael Gregson.

Comments

  1. I love the humor and irony in this, and this is a very touchy subject in our current times. The way we view ourselves has a huge impact on the people around us as well. Sometimes this view of ourselves comes from comparison to social media (celebrities), parents, peers, or even our neighborhood and associates. I think he is correct in saying that looking down on ourselves is unethical for the reasons of how much harm it has done to our society through depression and suicide.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Kind of mad that I saw this because this was gonna be my title and now I gotta come up with something else.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Now for a more serious reply...

      Hailey, I completely agree with you. In today's society, we may not see those who underestimate themselves in the highest of esteem, but we hold those individuals to a higher esteem than the vain. It is admirable to be humble in our views, so it is quite interesting to see Aristotle to have views which oppose several of our modern day society's views including this as well as his view on passivity and body size.

      Delete
  3. Hailey, I would agree with you! I definitely err to the side of self-deprecation in my humor and general air, but I would also agree with Aristotle in that there's a general mean we need to achieve in all things. Even in this culture, where it's normal to be self deprecating, I think we'd all agree that there's a line that gets crossed. There's a difference between the normal "Oh I'll just look like trash" jokes, and THOSE people, who are always fishing for compliments with their deprecation. Even in the midst of depression, there's a balance! Thanks, Aristotle!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hailey, your post had me rolling with laughter for a good few minutes. I think it is too often that we choose the underestimating side of things when given a spectrum to gauge things on because we have this innate sense that less is best when you are not given the right amount. This however, is flipped on its head given the context outside of these previously mentioned spectrums, as if one has less of a material needed for something, then that is worse than having an overabundance or extra of said needed material. Good thoughts nonetheless, I thoroughly enjoyed reading this one!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Apparently, self worth campaigns are not anything new. It makes a lot of sense, especially at that time, for self depreciation to be a problem, especially when you have a limited selection of your job in the future. In any case, humility is a great virtue, but self worth is also important

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

One shall stand, One shall fall // Ian Blair

      I usually have a little introduction into my thoughts about the reading for this week before I start with the actual blog part of my post, but I can't help but think about the bone-chilling realization that awaits us in Book VIII, so my introduction this time will be brief. It is my personal opinion that if people are imperfect, then we are only capable of imperfect systems and societies consequentially. However, this does not mean that we must not aim for the closest system to perfect that we can achieve.      The realization I wrote of earlier is the suggestion by Socrates that tyranny stems from the system we know as democracy. At first I disagreed, it is anarchism that causes  tyrannical reign as a byproduct of fulfilling its purpose of overthrowing the current power and not establishing another system. All anarchism does is create a power vacuum for another power to take over and the cycle repeats itself, right? ...Right? Quic...