Skip to main content

Ignorance is Bliss(?) (WAKE UP SHEEPLE) // Jackson Riddle

 Is it universally true that ignorance is considered to be bliss? They say what you don't know can't hurt you, but I beg to differ; not knowing about a test I have due the next day might be painful. 

In Chapter 7 of Plato's Republic, Plato creates an allegory of prisoners trapped in a cave for their entire life, knowing and understanding only what they can see and hear. Behind them a fire burns, with people walking back and forth in front of it, casting shadows on the wall in front of the prisoners. This is the extent of their reality. 

I found this allegory to be extremely interesting considering the times we live in, with media censorship and what not. Consider this: maybe we are in the same position as the prisoners in Plato's allegory, and we don't realize this because it's our reality, it's what we've always had and always will have. Plato alludes to this himself in the beginning of Book 7 when Glaucon says "You describe a strange prison and strange prisoners". Plato replies, "Like ourselves". 

Consider the power the media holds over society today, controlling the information that comes in and goes out. Would you not say that this is frighteningly relevant to Plato's allegory of the cave? Regardless of how despondent this may seem, one must remember the second portion of the allegory, the prisoner who broke free. He made the ascent up a steep incline and saw the world for what it truly was, not the lies he had been fed all his life. He then goes and shares his newfound knowledge with his former inmates, ecstatic about his discoveries and the potential of this new life. 

Whether you believe we're society's prisoners, we can choose to go against the flow, to fight back against the unjust society, and to share the truth with everyone. It may be painful but it's worth it. 


PS - I commented on Kaitlyn and Logan's posts. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more