Skip to main content

Life in a Bottle


In book VII of The Republic, we are presented with the allegory of the cave. Plato gives us a representation of the enlightenment of the soul. This is much like the spiritual enlightenment we receive through Christ. 

I grew up in a Southern Baptist household where I was taught the things of God from a very young age. Though I knew in my head about Jesus, He was only a shadow in my heart. He was like the shadows on the walls of the cave. I went to church every Sunday and Wednesday; every time the doors were open. I took in everything but took nothing seriously. I experienced life in a bottle, completely separated from spiritual reality. I was a prisoner chained in a cave; a prisoner to sin and my own selfish desires. I saw only shadows on the wall and heard only the echoes of all the voices around me, but I thought it was real. 

It wasn't until Jesus came down into my cave and led me by the hand into the light that I started to see. I began to understand that what I had been living was not true life, but only a distorted version of it. I began to finally comprehend what Jesus had done for me when He died on the cross. It was becoming real to me that the Holy Spirit was living inside me and guiding me in becoming more like Christ. I began to understand what it means to be more like Jesus. All of this was starting to be clear, but I was still seeing through spots. I had the dazed eyes of a person who had just come into the light.

"...good...is seen only with an effort; and, when it is seen, is also inferred to be the universal author of all things beautiful and right, parent of light and of the lord of light in this visible world, and the immediate source of reason and truth in the intellectual; and that is the power upon which he who would act rationally, either in public or private life, must have his eye fixed." (Plato, 203)

This is what Socrates wanted for the perfect city.; for people to have the ability to fix their eyes on the light of wisdom so they could live good lives. In The Republic, spiritual enlightenment meant one gained more perfect happiness. This passage of reading is strikingly similar to on in 1 John. "But if we are living in the light, as God is in the light, then we have fellowship with each other, and the blood of Jesus, his Son, cleanses us from all sin." (1:17) 

In the allegory we see a man being brought out of the darkness of the into the sunshine. This is a picture of what happens to us when we are brought out of the darkness of sin and into the brightness of the Son. When our enlightenment comes from the Lord, our happiness is made complete. As we continue to live in the light, our eyes will grow accustomed to its brightness. We no longer live in the shadows but in the fullness of God.

"...I am the light of the world. If you follow me, you won't have to walk in darkness, because you will have the light that leads to life." (John 8:12)


Commented on Haylee's and Braylan's posts.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...