Skip to main content

NERD NERD NERD NERD - Jamie Peters

 Look, if it isn't obvious already, I am a HUGE Percy Jackson fan. I just bought the last book in The Trials of Apollo series, like, Sunday, if that proves anything. I have been able to see (from a preteen perspective) the many, many, many differences between the Greek and Roman worlds and mythologies. Many such differences are perfectly displayed in the beginnings of each of these reading excerpts.

First, the excerpt given from Hesiod's Theogony details stories strictly about the gods and their decisions. We are shown many thrilling scenes, including Kronos eating his kids (1), Prometheus tricking Zeus (2), the horrible, dooming creation of women (3), and the relationship problems of Zeus. Even though the creation of mankind is discussed, human beings are considered WAY beneath the feet of the mighty gods, and are treated like such. In the Greek world, the gods are respected by the humans, but not considered present in everyday life.

The Roman gods, on the other hand, seem to be more involved in mankind's affairs. Ovid's documents depict the damnation of mankind by the gods for the sins of Lycaon and his followers (6-7), their subsequent rebirth by the two survivors of a world flood (8-9), and the apparent deification of Julius Caesar (9-11). In the Roman world, power is revered and often feared. No one had greater power than the gods, so if someone was blessed with power (Caesar), he must be closely connected to them. Sure, Greek people thought that too, but it is one thing to be blessed by the gods an another thing to be called one. You do not try to step up to their level, no matter how detached they are - you will be smited.

I commented on Rachael's and Ian's posts.

Comments

  1. Lily CaswellOctober 19, 2020 at 9:37 PM

    Offhand, I think the correct phrase is “you will be smitten” but I don’t know. I never really thought about that specific difference between the Greek and Roman gods though, so now you’ve got me thinking. There are many instances of gods (cough, cough, ZEUS) having children all over the place and them not being considered gods and sometimes not even demigods. (Unless of course, you’re in Camp Half-Blood.) With the Roman gods, the emperors after Julius Caesar are worshipped at the same level of Jupiter and Juno.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Abigale BellOctober 20, 2020 at 9:45 PM

    I loved reading your post! The differences you brought out are very clear. I can definitely see a big difference between the involvement of the gods in the everyday lives of the Greeks and Romans. I think their view of the gods played a lot into the way they lived their lives.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

One shall stand, One shall fall // Ian Blair

      I usually have a little introduction into my thoughts about the reading for this week before I start with the actual blog part of my post, but I can't help but think about the bone-chilling realization that awaits us in Book VIII, so my introduction this time will be brief. It is my personal opinion that if people are imperfect, then we are only capable of imperfect systems and societies consequentially. However, this does not mean that we must not aim for the closest system to perfect that we can achieve.      The realization I wrote of earlier is the suggestion by Socrates that tyranny stems from the system we know as democracy. At first I disagreed, it is anarchism that causes  tyrannical reign as a byproduct of fulfilling its purpose of overthrowing the current power and not establishing another system. All anarchism does is create a power vacuum for another power to take over and the cycle repeats itself, right? ...Right? Quic...
1 comment
Read more