Skip to main content

Oh, The Irony~ Logan Turner

 Bonus blog time! This is my first ever bonus blog so you should be honored. Also, I forgot about whether or not I could talk about all of Oedipus, so I'm gonna talk about the whole thing and just hope for the best.

So, I first read Oedipus senior year of high school. I really enjoyed it for  few reasons. One of which was because I already knew I was interested in the field of psychology and I knew this was where the name of the Oedipal Complex came from. But that's not what I'm gonna talk about. Instead, I'm gonna talk about the dramatic irony in the story. My personal favorite part about the whole thing is that Oedipus tried so hard to avoid his fate and ran towards it instead. The faster he ran from what he thought was his fate, the faster he ran to his actual fate, making the prediction come true. It kind of reminds me of someone in a horror movie running away from a monster, and in their panic, they run straight into a wall and knock themselves out. The whole "running away from one's destiny actually brings them closer to it" thing is actually one of my favorite tropes in any form of media, and I live for it; and it works especially well with Oedipus Rex.


Edit: Commented on Lily Caswell's and Caroline Tucker's posts

Comments

  1. I noticed that too! I thought about the story of Jonah because even though Jonah starts running, he ends up getting to where God wanted him in the first place. The whole play is full of irony but this was the one I noticed the most.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I completely agree! My first thought about running away from destiny makes the character closer to it was about “Revenge of the Sith”. In desperation to not let his vision into the future come true, he set up for the very thing to happen. Personally I blame the parents (both sets) for not telling him who his parents were.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...