Skip to main content

Rain, Rain, Go Away // Abigale Bell

 


The Roman account of the Great Flood is very interesting when compared with the Christian account. We can see similarities in the overall ideas of the story, but, more specifically, in the language. 

Jupiter says on page 6, "...it would take too long to tell what wickedness I found everywhere..." (Ovid, Book I). These words are strikingly similar to those of Moses in Genesis 6. "The Lord observed the extent of human wickedness on the earth, and he saw that everything they thought or imagined was consistently and totally evil" (Gen. 6:5). Both of these passages illustrate the major problem in every flood story: the totality of human evil. Of course, the only way to fix this problem is to destroy this flawed humanity and start over. 

The method of choice: a flood. Obviously, in both stories the mode of destruction was a flood. On page 8, we read about how "...the sea in unchecked freedom has buried the hills, and fresh waves beat against the mountaintops" (Ovid, Book I). A picture like this is drawn in Genesis where it says, "...all the underground waters erupted from the earth, and the rain fell in mighty torrents form the sky...Finally, the water covered even the highest mountains on the earth..." (Gen. 7:11, 19)

A final similarity to note is that in both stories, a few humans survive the purge of life. In the Roman version, Deucalion and his wife Pyrrha are floating in a boat and worshipping the gods. In the Chrisitan version, Noah and his family are also floating in a boat and worshipping God. In both cases, the humans are worshipping their God or gods, and fulfilling the purpose of the flood. That purpose was to turn the eyes of the humans back to who they were supposed to be worshipping in the first place. In both cases, it worked. 

Commented on Jamie's and Hailey's posts.

Comments

  1. Micah PowersOctober 22, 2020 at 7:51 AM

    I love your draw on exact scriptural language. You brought a great summary of exactly what makes them true. I know I had mentioned corroborating evidence in class and that is something I really see here. Lee Strobel talked about it in relation to roman documents multiple biblical accounts and personal accounts concerning the validity of the life of Jesus Christ. I see this as a great example of corroborating evidence with the existence of very similar flood stories in completely different cultures.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more