Skip to main content

Real Imaginary // Abigale Bell

 

I find it interesting that The Republic is concluded with a discussion on reality. The entire story, thus far, has been made up of different ideas and opinions which combine to form the ideal imaginary city. Emphasis on imaginary here.

In book ten, Socrates engages his listeners with an analogy for determining what is real and true rather than a copy of truth. He begins by speaking of beds and tables. Socrates states that the physical bed that one might lie on is only a copy of the original idea, therefore, only the idea is the real thing or essence of it. He then goes into speaking of painters and craftsmen as only imitators of an original idea which is the essense of the thing itself. Without getting lost in the complicatedness of it all, we can gather his meaning to be that only ideas are the true forms of things. 

But how do we know what good ideas look like? Socrates gives an analogy which explains how only musicians know what a good flute sounds like. The flute-maker will rely on the flute-player to create the best sounding flute. The musician knows what a good flute should sound like. This idea is similar in Socrates' creation of utopia. Socrates must know what the perfect city should look like in order to represent the idea of a perfect city. 

I could infer from this passage of reading that Socrates had all the answers to building the perfect city from the ground up. However, I don't think his goal in saying this was to assume all knowledge for himself. Maybe this was an allusion to the fact that he did not have all the answers. Maybe Socrates saw that his vision for the perfect city could never actually work.

We live in a fallen society. It is "a crooked and twisted generation," to quote the words of Paul in Philippians 2:15. How can we, according to Socrates' theory, create any kind of perfect world? We can't do it. The perfect city will remain a fantasy until the day that Jesus returns and establishes His perfect kingdom.


Commented on Caroline's and Lily's posts.

Comments

  1. I completely agree with your ending statements. I feel like even if Socrates was able to start from the ground up and raise the first generation from birth, there is still no way that the just city could be pulled off. Humanity is flawed by default.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Word Painting in Vesta—Lily Caswell

  Word painting in Weelkes’s As Vesta Was from Latmos Hill Descending is quite interesting. And because that is a really long title, I’m calling it Vesta from now on. Word painting is basically when the melody matches up with the lyrics. So in Vesta, when it says “ascending” and “descending”, there are obviously scales going up and down. The madrigal was written for six voices to sing unaccompanied, so when they start to come together, it matches with the lyrics; so if the lyric says “two by two”, there are only two voices; “three by three” there is another voice added, and so forth. All the parts combine in exclamation before Vesta before it is left “all alone” to the highest soprano. All the way to the end of the piece, word painting continues when shouts of “Long live fair Oriana” with the bass sustaining long notes. Word painting in and of itself is a highly interesting topic because a musician takes the words of a poem or a sonnet and writes a melody line that pertains to cer...

Honor and Gain; Which Do You Seek?

 Pericles.... thanks? I can only imagine that's what the family and friends were thinking after they heard his historic funeral speech honoring the departed. What do I mean? Well, Pericles briefly mentions the men who have fallen at the beginning of his speech, but then goes on to discuss how great Athens is, and how the contributions the city has made to the world are unmatched.. why? I understand that he is also commending the citizens of Athens and empowering them to continue to make their city greater, but I thought this was supposed to be a funeral speech about dead war heroes, not about Athens. Another thing I found interesting is what Pericles said on page five about honor: "For it is only the love of honour that never grows old; and honour it is, not gain, as some would have it, that rejoices the heart of age and helplessness" (Thucydides, page 5). Have you ever watched a show or movie, or read a book, about a duel between two men? There is always an unspoken agre...

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...