Skip to main content

Taking the Grr out of anger // Ian Blair

Aristotle's style of creating spectrums to define various virtuous or unvirtuous qualities of people really drives home how important it is to master the art of self control. Many times throughout history, division and chaos have been caused by those who do not exercise proper control over their feelings. One quality of utmost importance that can really cost someone quite a bit is their temper. Though at times it is best to let anger or rage motivate us to accomplish a positive goal, it is often this same temper that causes children to smash toys, fights to break out in the stands of sports events such as the NBA's Malice at the Palace in 2004, and rioters and looters to annihilate entire blocks on city streets. What does having a good temper look like? Aristotle makes his answer clear:

"The man who is angry at the right things and with the right people, and, further, as he ought, when he ought, and as long as he ought, is praised. This will be the good-tempered man, then, since good temper is praised. For the good-tempered man tends to be unperturbed and not to be led by passion, but to be angry in the manner, at the things, and for the length of time, that the rule dictates; but he is thought to err rather in the direction of deficiency; for the good-tempered man is not revengeful, but rather tends to make allowances." (Aristotle, 40).

That last line is quite the revealer of the difference in philosophy that people like Aristotle had versus the consensus of Athens at the time. Vengeance not being a good-tempered response, thereby negating it as a responsible action really differs from the custom of wronging someone who has wronged your family that Athens seemed to endorse. I personally would argue that being teaching the young and growing good self control and temperance would eliminate more than half the problems we currently face in today's "modern" society. That is not to say that we would have to make the younger generations Vulcan-like with their emotions, but developing a good temper would allow someone who has it to think rationally even under emotional pressure.

p.s. I commented on Hailey Morgan's and Braylan's posts.

Comments

  1. Learning how to control anger is definitely an important skill to possess. I will say, however, that there are some people who, instead of expressing sadness, will instead resort to getting frustrated. These people think that crying is a form of weakness and because of this, allow themselves to suppress their sorrows until they bubble over as full-force fury.

    It is for this reason why I believe we much teach children how to properly deal with all of their emotions. By only focusing on certain ones (ones that society has deemed as 'bad' or 'innapropriate'), we are essentially setting them up for failure.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Absolutely, what are some ways we could go about teaching a child a good temper and proper "feeling". Can feelings be improper or wrong? Are feelings ever bad in themselves?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...