Skip to main content

The gods of Theogony vs. The God of Genesis-Rachael Gregson

 


While reading the Theogony, I noted how some parts of it do seem very similar to the Book of Genesis. Both pieces of work entertain the idea of some being(s) creating the world out of nothing, as well as this/these certain being(s) craving a relationship with His/their creation, and the story of Jupiter destroying mankind with water was very reminiscent of Noah and the Ark. However, all similarities between the two stop there because the gods in the Theogony are very, very different from the God of Abraham and Jacob. 

Genesis Chapter 1, it is written that God Almighty created everything in the universe, and that therefore we as creation are dependent on our Creator. It is also clearly stated that man specifically was set apart from the rest to be made in God's image; with this gift, He allows us dominion over all of creation. Nothing is out of order, unless God ordains it to be for His purpose and plan. 

On the other hand, in Theogony, we see that the world's origin was utter chaos and still continues to operate in utter chaos. Unlike God, the celestial beings in the Theogony are just as flawed, if not even more flawed, than the humans they watch over. Not only this, but we never actually see the creation of man in the Theogony. The downfall of man is seriously jaded compared to the story we know from Adam and Eve too. Humans receive punishments from divinities rather than the sin they choose to delve in like in Genesis. "An eye for an eye" was a common thing in the Theogony that was followed, gods included, while God was merciful enough to give Adam and Eve another chance at life despite kicking them out of Eden (He originally said that whoever ate the fruit was to die). Adam and Eve did still die, but God allowed them a beautiful life of raising children and growing old together in between.

I commented on posts by Logan Turner and Haley Riddle.

Comments

  1. It is unclear based on Theogony the reason behind the creation of man. I know from outside sources that Prometheus and Epimetheus were tasked with it, but based on the characteristics shown in these works, humankind was created out of pure selfishness so that the gods had someone to worship them. I could be wrong, but that is what it feels like to me.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I find it very interesting your view on Adam and Eve's death. I have always been taught that death is only separation from God. Adam and Eve did die by that definition almost immediately. we are told as Christians that we gain everlasting life through Jesus alone and were dead prior to our saving. I think it depends on your definition of death on whether or not they did die initially. I know this is relatively deep philosophical ideas but it is something I ponder about much of. I think if we say Adam and Eve didn't die that poses the question of whether or not God keeps his word. That is beyond terrifying. I purpose that we are so skewed by the worlds idea of what death is that is hard for us to truly understand that passage. In my humble opinion death is simply unreachable separation. That definition satisfies both the current worldly view of death and holds God in his perfection of keeping his word. When a relative dies they are simply in an unreachable state to you and when we are dead before Jesus we are in an unreachable state to God because sinLESSness can not dwell with SinFULness.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I’ve always understood that Prometheus was in charge of creating mankind and Epimetheus was in charge of creating beasts. They were both given things to create with by Zeus or at least that’s what I’ve read. I do agree though that the Greek/Roman gods are very different from our God. Our God is merciful and gracious, but He’s also just. The Greek/Roman gods aren’t necessarily always like that.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Word Painting in Vesta—Lily Caswell

  Word painting in Weelkes’s As Vesta Was from Latmos Hill Descending is quite interesting. And because that is a really long title, I’m calling it Vesta from now on. Word painting is basically when the melody matches up with the lyrics. So in Vesta, when it says “ascending” and “descending”, there are obviously scales going up and down. The madrigal was written for six voices to sing unaccompanied, so when they start to come together, it matches with the lyrics; so if the lyric says “two by two”, there are only two voices; “three by three” there is another voice added, and so forth. All the parts combine in exclamation before Vesta before it is left “all alone” to the highest soprano. All the way to the end of the piece, word painting continues when shouts of “Long live fair Oriana” with the bass sustaining long notes. Word painting in and of itself is a highly interesting topic because a musician takes the words of a poem or a sonnet and writes a melody line that pertains to cer...

Welcome to Honors! (Please Read This)

     Welcome to Honors! My name is Abbie Hedden and I serve as President of Honors. Jamie Peters is our Vice President, and Caroline Tucker is our Secretary. I look forward to getting to know all of you in class during this upcoming year! There are a few things you need to know about Honors.      There are no quizzes or tests in Honors. Grades are provided based on attendance/class participation, blogs, explication papers, and the research paper. The papers will be addressed at a later date, as they aren't due until later in the semester. However, there is a blog post due every week. Bearing that in mind, here are the requirements! Criteria Blog posts are due Monday at 11:59PM , and comments are due Tuesday at 9:29AM . DO NOT BE LATE ON ASSIGNMENTS. Points WILL be deducted from late assignments! Be sure to have your name in your Blogger profile Blog posts should include at least one to two paragraphs on that week’s reading assignment.  Blog posts shoul...

Topsy Turvy Day—Lily Caswell

  I cannot remember how old I was when I watched T he Hunchback of Notre Dame  but I was at least 8 or 9. I didn’t realize until probably a couple of years ago that the song  “Topsy Turvy” and the corresponding event was actually based on a real festival. The Feast of Fools was usually held on January 1 though it could have also been held on the 6 th  or the 13 th  of January. It was portrayed as a parody of Catholic feasts. Church bells were rung improperly, songs were sung out of tune, and the celebrants “wore strange garments and masks, and used puddings, sausages, and old shoes as censers.” (Seaton, p 77) In the song “Topsy Turvy”, it says “It’s the day the devil in us gets released / It’s the day we mock the prig and shock the priest / Everything is Topsy Turvy at the Feast of Fools… And it’s the day we do the things that we deplore ‘ On the other three hundred and sixty-four.”  I commented on Haylee Lynd’s and Jamie’s posts. Sources: https://www.brita...