Skip to main content

The Prodigal Son and the Magnificent Man // Abigale Bell

 "...Quick! Bring the finest robe in the house and put it on him. Get a ring for his finger and sandals for his feet. And kill the calf we have been fattening. We must celebrate with a feast..." (Luke 15:22-23)

A man has two sons; one older, and one younger. The younger son decides to take all of his inheritance right away. His father gives him his money so he leaves home, and spends it all on lavish living. As soon as the money runs out, a famine strikes the land and the son is left starving. After working as a farm hand and being so hungry that even the pigs' food looks appetizing, the son decides to return home and beg for a place as a servant in his father's house. Instead of scorning him for wasting his money so foolishly, the father welcomes him home and showers him with rich gifts. 

This is the story of the prodigal son. As I read what Aristotle had to say about prodigality, I couldn't help but think of this story in the Bible. I must confess, I didn't understand the meaning of the word "prodigal" until Aristotle brought it to my attention. I have always thought "prodigal" had a positive meaning akin to: one who returns home. Instead, the word has a negative connotation. The prodigal man is the one who spends what he has foolishly and flippantly.  

Aristotle discusses the mean of virtues. Prodigality is on the excessive side of the spectrum in relation to wealth, with liberality as the mean. This idea can be seen in the characters of Luke 15. 

Looking at this story from Aristotle's point of view, I immediately see the son as having the excessive quality of prodigality. He has squandered his fortune on temporary pleasures. The son fulfills quite well the definition of "prodigal." 

The father, however, is harder to place. He seems, at first, to display not a virtue, but a vice. Of liberality Aristotle says, on page 32, "Therefore the liberal man, like other virtuous men, will give for the sake of the noble, and rightly; for he will give to the right people, the right amounts, and at the right time..." The father invests his money (his son's inheritance) in his youngest son before the appointed time. He allows his son to go off and live how he wants. This seems to display prodigality rather than liberality. In the end, when the son returns home, the father lavishes riches on his son. Again, an example of a bad investment?

If we were to look through the father's eyes for a moment, we would see only a loved child; not a bad investment, but a great one. We would see a son who recognized the error of his ways and turned from it. In this light, the father represents not only liberality, but even magnificence, as Aristotle would call it. This is in the sense that the father gave freely, without calculation. He also gave greatly, bestowing expensive gifts on his returned son. Here, the giving far outweighed the gain, or maybe, to the father, it didn't.  According to Aristotle, magnificence is a step beyond liberality in that a magnificent man will go the extra mile by giving with grand ceremony. The father throws a party for his son's return, and he gives rich gifts with an air of grandeur. Here we see the quality of magnificence displayed.


...Commented on Rachael's and Braylan's posts.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Word Painting in Vesta—Lily Caswell

  Word painting in Weelkes’s As Vesta Was from Latmos Hill Descending is quite interesting. And because that is a really long title, I’m calling it Vesta from now on. Word painting is basically when the melody matches up with the lyrics. So in Vesta, when it says “ascending” and “descending”, there are obviously scales going up and down. The madrigal was written for six voices to sing unaccompanied, so when they start to come together, it matches with the lyrics; so if the lyric says “two by two”, there are only two voices; “three by three” there is another voice added, and so forth. All the parts combine in exclamation before Vesta before it is left “all alone” to the highest soprano. All the way to the end of the piece, word painting continues when shouts of “Long live fair Oriana” with the bass sustaining long notes. Word painting in and of itself is a highly interesting topic because a musician takes the words of a poem or a sonnet and writes a melody line that pertains to cer...
4 comments
Read more

Honor and Gain; Which Do You Seek?

 Pericles.... thanks? I can only imagine that's what the family and friends were thinking after they heard his historic funeral speech honoring the departed. What do I mean? Well, Pericles briefly mentions the men who have fallen at the beginning of his speech, but then goes on to discuss how great Athens is, and how the contributions the city has made to the world are unmatched.. why? I understand that he is also commending the citizens of Athens and empowering them to continue to make their city greater, but I thought this was supposed to be a funeral speech about dead war heroes, not about Athens. Another thing I found interesting is what Pericles said on page five about honor: "For it is only the love of honour that never grows old; and honour it is, not gain, as some would have it, that rejoices the heart of age and helplessness" (Thucydides, page 5). Have you ever watched a show or movie, or read a book, about a duel between two men? There is always an unspoken agre...
Post a Comment
Read more

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more