Skip to main content

"When am I going to use this though?"//Haylee Lynd

     All throughout middle and high school, my peers and I have always asked our math teachers, "When am I going to use this though?" This question was generally met with the same answer as always: "You're learning problem solving." Otherwise, it would be dismissed entirely. Thus, I never wanted to be in math class. I've known since I was in the fifth grade that I have wanted to be a writer or to go in a creative field, so I saw no need to learn higher level math that I really only saw as necessary to learn for people who were going to be architects or engineers.

     However, Socrates states that "calculation thrusts the soul upward"(Plato 220). He argues that to acquire true wisdom one must study mathematics. Mathematics directs the mind towards abstract truths because numbers exist in the intelligible realm.  I find it fascinating that Socrates says "both the soldier and the philosopher must master" mathematics(219).  I absolutely adore the art of philosophizing so to say that it is necessary to master math in order to "transcend the world of appearances and reach out to the world of reality" contradicts my beliefs and brings about a kind of conviction to me who has never seen the point of mastering it if the need for it in my career was not obvious(219). My conviction will not lead me to take a calculus class again though, so my apologies to Socrates.

     Additionally, I find his argument interesting because I don't know of any philosophy majors who are required to take higher level maths in order to get their degree, apart from prerequisites. Because of Socrates' argument, should we make it a priority for philosophy majors to take and master higher level mathematics? 


P.S. I commented on Lily and and Abbie's posts.

Comments

  1. You ask an extremely intriguing question, Haylee. During high school, I found all subjects, including math, to be a good way to stave off boredom, so I was able to appreciate math for just being math. Mathematics can be used to explain every physical part of the known world. For philosophy, this is a fantastic first step to explaining things outside of Earth because you can explain the Earth itself. Good post!

    ReplyDelete
  2. As someone who practically can't count to five, I relate to your post more than I really should. I asked this of my math teachers all the time! They always said that when you work out and lift weights, you're getting stronger. You don't lift weights on the softball field in the middle of the game - you're not "using" weight lifting - but it trained you and made you better at softball anyway. And I can safely say as a non-philosophy major, YES! Let's make them take higher level math! Haha.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Technically speaking, the word philosophy means "love of wisdom" so if they consider math to be wisdom, then yes I can understand him wanting philosophers to master math. On the other hand though, I hate math and I would not wish it upon any others unless they have a love for it. I've always been that guy that asked "Why do I need to know Calculus if I'm going to major in psychology?" The answer never came, but I think the major point of taking advanced math if you aren't going to use it is so that you develop methods of taking on difficult problems, so that you can handle them. That's all conjecture, though

    ReplyDelete
  4. As much as I hate to admit it, I think Socrates was on to something. Math and I have a tenuous relationship at best. At worst...it's better left unsaid. I would rather not think about the positive qualities of the discipline. Although, Socrates had an interesting view on the benefits of thinking mathmatically. The more I read, the more his words made sense to me. I can see math as being good practice in thinking beyond the physical world; in viewing things as they actually are and not what they appear to be. However, I am content to leave the philosphyzing to philosophers if it means I don't have to master calculus.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I’ve always really hated math and while I can see how it could (might would be a better term . . .) be useful, I’m still going to come out and say that a majority of us will not ever need or use it! Yes, math helps kids develop their problem solving skills, but they are only allowed to do so within the strict rules of the subject. I feel like, even though they have to puzzle things out, in the end, they don’t really gain too much because in math, there is only one correct way and only one correct answer. Brainstorming and problem solving do not work hand-in-hand in math and I feel as if that duo is more useful in the long run. Instead, mathematics teaches its students basic memorization and regurgitation.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Word Painting in Vesta—Lily Caswell

  Word painting in Weelkes’s As Vesta Was from Latmos Hill Descending is quite interesting. And because that is a really long title, I’m calling it Vesta from now on. Word painting is basically when the melody matches up with the lyrics. So in Vesta, when it says “ascending” and “descending”, there are obviously scales going up and down. The madrigal was written for six voices to sing unaccompanied, so when they start to come together, it matches with the lyrics; so if the lyric says “two by two”, there are only two voices; “three by three” there is another voice added, and so forth. All the parts combine in exclamation before Vesta before it is left “all alone” to the highest soprano. All the way to the end of the piece, word painting continues when shouts of “Long live fair Oriana” with the bass sustaining long notes. Word painting in and of itself is a highly interesting topic because a musician takes the words of a poem or a sonnet and writes a melody line that pertains to cer...

Welcome to Honors! (Please Read This)

     Welcome to Honors! My name is Abbie Hedden and I serve as President of Honors. Jamie Peters is our Vice President, and Caroline Tucker is our Secretary. I look forward to getting to know all of you in class during this upcoming year! There are a few things you need to know about Honors.      There are no quizzes or tests in Honors. Grades are provided based on attendance/class participation, blogs, explication papers, and the research paper. The papers will be addressed at a later date, as they aren't due until later in the semester. However, there is a blog post due every week. Bearing that in mind, here are the requirements! Criteria Blog posts are due Monday at 11:59PM , and comments are due Tuesday at 9:29AM . DO NOT BE LATE ON ASSIGNMENTS. Points WILL be deducted from late assignments! Be sure to have your name in your Blogger profile Blog posts should include at least one to two paragraphs on that week’s reading assignment.  Blog posts shoul...

Topsy Turvy Day—Lily Caswell

  I cannot remember how old I was when I watched T he Hunchback of Notre Dame  but I was at least 8 or 9. I didn’t realize until probably a couple of years ago that the song  “Topsy Turvy” and the corresponding event was actually based on a real festival. The Feast of Fools was usually held on January 1 though it could have also been held on the 6 th  or the 13 th  of January. It was portrayed as a parody of Catholic feasts. Church bells were rung improperly, songs were sung out of tune, and the celebrants “wore strange garments and masks, and used puddings, sausages, and old shoes as censers.” (Seaton, p 77) In the song “Topsy Turvy”, it says “It’s the day the devil in us gets released / It’s the day we mock the prig and shock the priest / Everything is Topsy Turvy at the Feast of Fools… And it’s the day we do the things that we deplore ‘ On the other three hundred and sixty-four.”  I commented on Haylee Lynd’s and Jamie’s posts. Sources: https://www.brita...