Skip to main content

Why Scrooge Is NOT VIRTUOUS. // Abbie Hedden

Scrooge is an amazing story about how a man used introspection and a loopy dream to become virtuous, right? According to Aristotle, that's wrong, and I'll tell you why. Aristotle emphasizes a balance in all things. Anything taken in excess can end badly; even virtuous things taken too far become vices. Scrooge never made sense to me, and I don't think the beloved Christmas story would make too much sense to Aristotle either. In the beginning, it is clear. Scrooge is hated by everyone who knows him because he is a greedy miser. He basically steals from the poor, shows no grace to the impoverished, and accumulates wealth for himself at the expense of everyone else. While he goes about it in a mostly legal way, it still burdens all those around him, as they have no way to pay back the massive debts they accumulate. If you look at it then, it shows a very Aristotlean point of view; he is doing what he should by accumulating money, but by doing it in an excessive way, he harms those around him and becomes miserable. However, when it gets to the end of the story, Scrooge gives away bountiful amounts of money. He buys out an entire toy shop, purchases the most expensive turkey in the butcher's shop, and forgives everyone's debts. This does not show virtue like the writers would have you believe; instead, this is the wild pendulum swing to the other side of matters of money. He is throwing away his money with little to no regard for widsom or savings. In this way, Scrooge does not become virtuous, he simply changes his vice.

PS Braylan and Hailey Morgan

Comments

  1. Jamie PetersOctober 26, 2020 at 8:35 PM

    Very interesting observation, Abbie! In the Christian culture, it is more encouraged to go to the extreme ends of the virtues than it is stay in the middle of the line. Take anger, for instance. Many people misinterpret the lesson taught in Matthew 5:38-40 (Going the Extra Mile) that getting angry at people when they do misdeeds against you is wrong. There isn't enough space here to explain the correct viewing of that passage, but overall, trying for less wrong seems to be a common theme.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Rachael GregsonOctober 27, 2020 at 12:27 AM

    Scrooge's sudden change has always seemed rather fishy to me (a literal overnight change), but then again the man was shown his headstone and burial site. A scene like that would sober just about anyone up. Maybe drastic circumstances can actually determine drastic results? I'd like to think his transformation was genuine. The disciples in the Bible did things like that. They were prepared to leave everything they had behind for Jesus.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.
4 comments
Read more

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....
5 comments
Read more

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...
7 comments
Read more