Skip to main content

A Man with Self-Control? - Clabo

Throughout all of the ancient epics, the Aeneid has always been my favorite. I have always found Aeneas to be a virtuous warrior, and I was even reminded of this fact within the first three books. The main point that stands out to me is when Aeneas sees Helen hiding during the fall of Troy. He is overcome with anger and wants to kill her because she is one of the main reasons that the war started in the first place. However, he is patient and listens to his mother, Venus, and just decides to leave. I feel that if Achilles was placed in that same position, a goddess would not have even had the time to approach him before he had already killed her. Another thing that find impressive in Aeneas's character is the fact that is always slow to act whether it be in listening to the gods advice or even letting a Greek straggler on to his ship. Aeneas, to me, is the perfect example of a man who pursues virtue instead of glory.  

This is just my opinion. What are your thoughts?

P.S. I commented on Kaitlyn Terry's and Jackson Riddle's posts.

Comments

  1. I would have to agree that Aeneas is a much better representation of how an honorable warrior should both act and behave. However, the author was a bit biased when it came to character creation. After all, Virgil's goal was to tell the "historical" story of the Romans and he had to make it sound good. As we've said before in class, the Romans saw everybody else as a barbarian, so by creating this new, more controlled hero, Virgil was only adding to the Romans' innate pride of being a more refined and dignified people.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with what you said about how Aeneas pursues virtue more than glory. You are definitely right about how Achilles would have just killed Hellen without giving one thought about it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. One of my favorite moments of Aeneas being a great man is when he goes to look for his wife. It is heartbreaking, but the amount of devotion that Aeneas shows towards the people he loves, including his son, his father, and his followers, truly points to the worthiness that this man has to lead.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I really loved how you contrasted Aeneas with Achilles. You could tell right off the bat that Achilles has a bad temper and would have likely struck her down versus Aeneas, despite his internal anger, who acts very graceful externally.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yeah, I really agree with you. Aeneas' qualities that make him different from Achilles are what makes him a likeable character. He is pretty much the opposite of Achilles and as a result, is the better character, considering Achilles was so deeply flawed.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I love the self control shown in Aeneus in this moment. It for me demonstrates mans possibility for good. I love how we get to see polar opposites in the characters and brashness of Aeneus and Achilles. I love seeing a man with self control as that is such a major flaw within mankind of today and almost encouraged to be without self control by music and popular media. the Bible continually reminds of the importance of self control.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...