Skip to main content

Aeneas and Dido.. and Shakespeare? // Jackson Riddle

Love is dangerous and often forbidden, as the classic tale of Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet shows with drama and scandal. While the love between Aeneas and Dido is not particularly forbidden, there is an air of deception in their love as the gods and goddesses meddle once more with human affairs. Venus shows a disregard for fate by making Dido fall for Aeneas, despite the fact that Dido refuses to love another, saying she would never want to betray Sychaeus' memory (Dido's first husband). Virgil describes Dido's love for Aeneas with somewhat violent descriptors: "With longing that her heart's blood fed, a wound or inward fire eating her away." (95). His description of Dido's love for Aeneas foreshadows her dark fate that awaits her, when she takes her own life in despair over Aeneas leaving. Once again the gods continue to interfere in the affairs of humanity, because as Aeneas is leaving, Anna, Dido's sister, begs him to stay to avoid the treacherous winter weather, but the fates and the heavens block Aeneas' ears, and he is unswayed by Anna's persuasion. I found it interesting that Virgil portrays Aeneas as a deeply rooted tree when Anna is attempting to persuade him; it symbolizes Aeneas' piety, but shows how he is unable to feel empathy for Dido, much like how a tree has no emotion whatsoever. 

Edit: I commented on Micah and Clabo's posts

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more