Skip to main content

Jupiter is a boss-Rachael Gregson

 



One thing I found humorous in the Aeneid was Jupiter himself. While all the other gods and goddesses were running around like chickens with their heads cut off trying to sway particular humans into siding with their cause, Jupiter is the only one who actually can force humans into his will but ultimately decides not to each time. When Venus suggests that he assist her with the Trojans, he merely says that the destiny of her son is set, and that nothing can stop the Trojans from becoming the strongest empire, reaffirming her that "it is decreed/that there the realm of Troy will rise again." (lines 287-288) The only situation he really interferes with the human world is when one of the goddesses inappropriately injures a mortal. Something about his role in our reading makes me chuckle. It is like he's the peacemaker on a middle school playground that referees fights and picks up the broken pieces of everyone afterwards. He doesn't really get in the middle of anything and trusts that humans are capable of working out their own matters, unlike the other gods who like to meddle with whatever they can get their hands on.

I commented on posts by Jacob Clabo and Abbie Hedden.

Comments

  1. I like your perspective of Jupiter as the referee in a fight, it put a new light on how I saw him as a character in the epic. I personally understand what it's like to be the referee; growing up, I was the oldest of 3, and as I grew older I often found myself holding back my siblings from a full on war, making sure to stay neutral. It's interesting that Jupiter takes this stance in the affairs of mortals, as he could easily overuse his power to meddle in anything he wants.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I realized something similar as well about the gods. I thought it was interesting to see the difference between the Greek gods and what the Romans changed them to. It is easily seen how the Romans changed the Greek gods into somewhat order loving and justice driven gods. The Roman perception of the gods is definitely a better view to believe and follow in. It gives more hope and structure.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...