Skip to main content

Jupiter is a boss-Rachael Gregson

 



One thing I found humorous in the Aeneid was Jupiter himself. While all the other gods and goddesses were running around like chickens with their heads cut off trying to sway particular humans into siding with their cause, Jupiter is the only one who actually can force humans into his will but ultimately decides not to each time. When Venus suggests that he assist her with the Trojans, he merely says that the destiny of her son is set, and that nothing can stop the Trojans from becoming the strongest empire, reaffirming her that "it is decreed/that there the realm of Troy will rise again." (lines 287-288) The only situation he really interferes with the human world is when one of the goddesses inappropriately injures a mortal. Something about his role in our reading makes me chuckle. It is like he's the peacemaker on a middle school playground that referees fights and picks up the broken pieces of everyone afterwards. He doesn't really get in the middle of anything and trusts that humans are capable of working out their own matters, unlike the other gods who like to meddle with whatever they can get their hands on.

I commented on posts by Jacob Clabo and Abbie Hedden.

Comments

  1. Jackson RiddleNovember 11, 2020 at 11:55 PM

    I like your perspective of Jupiter as the referee in a fight, it put a new light on how I saw him as a character in the epic. I personally understand what it's like to be the referee; growing up, I was the oldest of 3, and as I grew older I often found myself holding back my siblings from a full on war, making sure to stay neutral. It's interesting that Jupiter takes this stance in the affairs of mortals, as he could easily overuse his power to meddle in anything he wants.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Caroline TuckerNovember 12, 2020 at 7:59 AM

    I realized something similar as well about the gods. I thought it was interesting to see the difference between the Greek gods and what the Romans changed them to. It is easily seen how the Romans changed the Greek gods into somewhat order loving and justice driven gods. The Roman perception of the gods is definitely a better view to believe and follow in. It gives more hope and structure.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more