Skip to main content

When in Rome, I guess... // Abbie Hedden

I know I should have remembered this from when we read Paradise Lost, but I keep forgetting that every epic has a call to or invocation of the Muse. It's how The Iliad, Paradise Lost, The Aeneid, and even O Brother Where Art Thou all begin. As someone who dabbles in writing, it's very interesting to me that these writers all began the same way to tell vastly different stories. It's even more interesting that this call to the Muse vastly differs across these stories. My theory is that this invocation shows more than one would at first expect. In The Iliad, the invocation begins at the very first two words:  "Rage - Goddess." Homer is invoking the indignance of the immortals, asking them to rage over injustice and turmoil. It sounds personal, as one would ask something of their mother. However, in the Aeneid, the call to the Muse feels more like a formality than a humble request. Virgil writes, "Wars and a man I sing..." While Homer was asking the Muse to tell the story, Virgil right away is writing in first person. He only asks for the Muse a paragraph later, saying "Tell me, Muse, how it all began." This is a parsed command rather than an invocation. I think this disparity speaks to the difference between the Greeks and Romans. The Greeks' lives seemingly revolved more around appeasing the gods than the Romans, whose religion was more a formality than anything else. This pattern continues later in the books, but it's interesting to me that you don't have to go more than a few lines to see just how different their priorities really were.


Commented on Haylee Lynd's and Caroline Tucker's 

Comments

  1. I never put that together, but that's so fascinating. I love how that speaks to the different cultures and how they viewed religion.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with Kaitlyn Terry, Abbie. I never noticed this either, but it's so cool that you pointed this difference between the Romans and Greeks out in your blog post. I think all cultures in a sense have their own style of writing. Personally, I prefer the muse instantly starting off the story, rather than the writer stepping aside for the muse to begin. Humorously, it reminds me a lot of the movie Hercules.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...