Skip to main content

Everything is not what it seems... // Ian Blair

 “An individual who does not have a focus or direction to pursue with their precious time will never know what it is like to live their best life.” - me. Augustine shows an uptick in his mindset as it begins changing between books V and VI. For a couple of decades, he pursued what he thought was the truth of life in various other pleasures and/or philosophies. In Book V we see him take his search of the truth to Faustus, a renowned speaker and communicator of Manichean philosophy and teaching, who is said to have known and read about the different views on life and how exactly it is that the Manichean view is different from other “false” teachings. What Augustine finds however, is a disappointing revelation:

"As soon as the opportunity arose I and some of my friends claimed his attention at a time when a private discussion would not be inappropriate. I mentioned some of my doubts, but soon discovered that except for a rudimentary knowledge of literature he had no claims to scholarship. . . As soon as it became clear to me that Faustus was quite uninformed about the subjects in which I had expected him to be an expert, I began to lose hope that he could lift the veil and resolve the problems which perplexed me.” (Augustine, 98).

 

The very nature of philosophy apparently puts a Manichee on defense straight out of the gate in conversation, and potentially makes them not even want to discuss deeper subjects at all. Now I am by no means an expert on morality or philosophy, but a philosophical-natured religion that fears philosophy?! That just blares a warning of misguidance that minds such as Augustine’s simply can’t ignore. As a result, while Book VI explores Augustine and his findings with Catholicism, Augustine is understandably hesitant to fully commit to the faith before he attends numerous services and learns to interpret the bible in a less literal sense. He notes that he misconstrued the teaching that humanity was made in God’s image (114-115), and at least seems open to the idea of the Church. I am truly baffled at how much hypocrisy Augustine has had to decipher in order to just get some straight answers from teachers. Whether it be in the schools he attended as a boy, or the philosophical groups or other religions he was a part of at some point, Augustine clearly had a longing for truth and answers in his youth that only God could satisfy.


p.s. I commented on Haylee Lynd's and Kaitlyn's posts.

Comments

  1. I really enjoyed how you made the connection between the Manichees and their fear of philosophy. I had not really thought of it that way!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...