Skip to main content

Have We Forgotten Who Worship Is Actually For?-Rachael Gregson

     


    Although I couldn't carry a tune even if it had handles with my voice, music has always been very special to me. There's not a moment that I don't have it playing-driving, doing homework, walking around campus, you name it. Whenever there's an empty gap of silence in my life, I fill it anyway I can with music. It's how I understand other people and how other people understand me. Society has taught me that music is for us. However, after reading St. Augustine's take on specifically making music to God, I realize just how much of a snare it is singing in church with an attitude like this. There's a fine line that needs to be drawn when it reaches this point-we aren't singing along for our entertainment, like all the other secular songs we sing during car rides or girls' nights. Rather, we are singing along for God's entertainment. Worshipping in church or anywhere else to God was never about us. This isn't to say that we can't find solace in these songs or go to them to raise our spirits, we just can't make them all about us or come away disappointed to find that worship "didn't have any effect on us." Worship has always been meant for God, because He is the only One perfect enough to warrant praise. The positive changes and feelings it does inside of us just comes along with it as a bonus, but somehow we've got the false imitation that we sit at the altar, cry our lungs out, and expect Him to place something in our hands and that if we don't get that perfect affirmation we need then worship that Sunday just wasn't successful. No, worship is our sacrifice to God. Whether He feels a mile away from you or right next to you, worship Him still. Because in that moment, it's not about how you feel; it's about who He is!  Dr. Soong-San Rah states something similar in his book The New Evangelicalism. He writes, "While there are times we should express our personal adoration of God, should the subject of the majority of our songs be the great I rather than the 'great I Am'? Worship, which should be the ascribing of worth to an Almighty God, can become an exercise of attaining self-fulfillment." 

I commented on posts by Caroline and Brooke. 

Comments

  1. I have never thought of worshipping as a sacrifice, but after reading this blog, I have to feel somewhat ashamed for being so naive. Anything that is brought to God from this world is a sacrifice, and we just forget that sacrifices should not be taken lightly.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really liked your point about that worship is not about us. Worship is a relationship between God and ourselves. We should come second to God in our worship and listen to Him.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You made the point that worship music is meant for God, not for our entertainment, which I also discussed in my post. Worship is absolutely to and for God. The purpose is to praise and glorify Him, not ourselves, yet in many worship services selfishness and passiveness have the throne. The worship team make it about themselves, and the church people are checking a task off of their to do list. It seems as though no one truly enters a time of worship, and it is damaging to the Church as a whole.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...