Skip to main content

Making Music to Move the Masses - Hailey Morgan

Starting off this semester with a look back at the origins of music was honestly a much needed refresher. When Dr. Abernathy told us that bad music can, quite literally, harm one's soul, I felt an immediate sense of guilt. Since coming to college, I have really neglected listening to worship music and have instead surrounded myself with many popular, secular songs. That said, the St. Basil reading could not have arrived at a better time!

I love how most of our early music was created with the sole purpose of helping people to better understand deep theological messages and ideals. The wording that St. Basil uses when describing how worship music should work is absolutely beautiful and incredibly clever! By packaging important truths within joyous songs, we are both learning and memorizing key facts about Christianity. By subconsciously hiding these truths within our hearts, we are all the more prepared to, as St. Basil would say, educate our souls. In addition, we can cling to these songs in times of trouble and worship the Lord even when it is difficult.

Still, we must always remember to keep our focus on the Lord when singing praises to Him. Even St. Basil warns that getting caught-up in the music and not the message of a worship song is not at all beneficial. When we sing, we should be singing to the Lord and not for men. 

 Edit - Replied to Leanne White and Brooke Hutcheson.

Comments

  1. My father always said, "Le, if you plant corn, you grow corn." In other words, whatever secular content you plant in your head, whether intentional or not, that "seed" is going to grow. Listening to music with sinful messages of lust or hatred dampens your spirit and those thoughts take over your mind like vines on the side of your house. The best way to prevent those branches from entangling you and consuming your mind, body, and soul is to just not plant them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am guilty of the same thing. I find myself listening to secular music way more than I do Christian music. It is kind of weird that I always find myself doing this because I do a whole lot better mentally when I listen to Christian music.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...