Skip to main content

The Purpose of Worship - Kaitlyn Terry

 St. Augustine makes it perfectly clear that the purpose of worship is not to sing, though many Christians get caught up in that. The purpose of worship is to learn and praise, the music is simply a vessel. Oftentimes Christians seem to get caught up in the performance of worship, not the benefits of the words being sung. Worship, specifically the Psalms, is said to be an "Arbitrator of souls, restraining the disorder and turbulence of thoughts.. it softens the passion of the soul and moderates its unruliness" (St. Basil par 2). 

Worship is meant to provoke thought and peace, it is not meant to be performative. While worship is meant to provoke thought, it is not, however, meant to be glorified and it is not meant to be a source of theology. Worship and the accompanying music is a vessel for God's word and love, not vice versa. Music was, and still is an essential medium of worship, but it is not everything. Music is a means of communicating worship, and it should not take the focus off of what is being sung.

(I commented on Brooke and Leanne's posts)

Comments

  1. Haylee LyndJanuary 25, 2021 at 8:14 PM

    I 100% agree with this. Especially today, with modern tech- lights and speakers and screens- it's easy to forget that the performance and the visuals don't matter, and I'm saying this as a techie. It doesn't matter at all in comparison to Jesus. I know worship leaders and tech team members of the church get caught up in worrying about what the congregation might think of the visuals and the lights. I know its's exciting and tempting to focus on those things. They're not bad things. If used correctly, they can bring more power to the worship and direct even more attention to God and to the cross, but the substance is in the words.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

One shall stand, One shall fall // Ian Blair

      I usually have a little introduction into my thoughts about the reading for this week before I start with the actual blog part of my post, but I can't help but think about the bone-chilling realization that awaits us in Book VIII, so my introduction this time will be brief. It is my personal opinion that if people are imperfect, then we are only capable of imperfect systems and societies consequentially. However, this does not mean that we must not aim for the closest system to perfect that we can achieve.      The realization I wrote of earlier is the suggestion by Socrates that tyranny stems from the system we know as democracy. At first I disagreed, it is anarchism that causes  tyrannical reign as a byproduct of fulfilling its purpose of overthrowing the current power and not establishing another system. All anarchism does is create a power vacuum for another power to take over and the cycle repeats itself, right? ...Right? Quic...
1 comment
Read more