Skip to main content

A Royal Mess// Haylee Lynd

     Did anyone else notice the rather juicy subplot that's foreshadowed in the story? While I am unsure of whether it actually occurs within the epic as I cannot recall, it appears that Hrothulf, King Hrothgar's nephew is going to usurp the throne from Hrothgar's eldest son, his rightful heir. Just to refresh your memory of the characters:

Hrothgar is king of the Danes.

Hrothulf is Hrothgar's nephew. 

Hrethric is Hrothgar's eldest son.

Hrothmund is Hrothgar's second son.

Wealhtheow is Hrothgar's wife, the queen.

The epic foreshadows a lot. In fact, it almost foreshadows everything. Thus, when the text states, "...and Wealhtheow came to sit...between two good me, / uncle and nephew, each one of whom still trusted the other..." I know almost for certain that something is going to happen between the two men(1161-1164). The uncle is Hrothgar and the nephew is Hrothulf. After this statement is made, Wealhtheow gives a speech in which she advises Hrothgar to retire while he may and give his kingdom to is kin. Then she exclaims, "I am certain of Hrothulf. / He is noble and will use the young ones well. / He will not let you down. Should you die before him, / he will treat out children truly and fairly. / He will honor, I am sure, our two sons..." (1179-1183).  It appears that Hrothgar's two sons are not yet old enough to take the throne if Hrothgar were to die, so Hrothulf would take the throne. Wealhtheow's overconfidence in Hrothulf gives me a sense that he is not going to treat her two sons very well. It appears he is going to betray their family. I say this with the knowledge that the epic foreshadows everything. For example, they praise and praise their relief from Grendel but then have to deal with his mother. In addition, this speech comes after a story told about treachery, so it only feels right that it occur in their lives.

P.S. I commented on Hailey Morgan's and Rachel's post.

Comments

  1. Oooh I like a good theory, especially one that leans more on the dramatic side of things once the Grendel/grendel's mother problem is dealt with. Perhaps there is a story out there of what happen in Denmark after Beowulf leaves for the final time? Good deduction nonetheless!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am glad someone else noticed it because this being my first time reading through Beowulf, I was almost waiting for some kind of coup d'etat to take place. My favorite narratives have always been the ones that allow the mind to wander and imagine what the other pieces of the story are. It's as if the stories engage me and allow me to contribute.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...