Skip to main content

A Worthy Career//Haylee Lynd

      My favorite phrase within all that we've read this weekend is "a career of worship." The monks dedicated to it. Reading about the eight services which made up the day of the Canonical Hours or the Divine Office was quite convicting for me. It appears the monks are functioning from dusk til dawn. During all that time, everything they are doing is being done to bring glory to the Lord. They do, essentially, a quiet time in the early morning hours, eat, study, worship, and work(and their work as monks was not really anything extraordinary secular). They were constantly in a mindset of working for the Lord. I work at a church helping to manage our tech, our tech volunteers, and our social media. This does not mean I am in the constant mindset of working for the Lord, however. I fail continuously to spend intentional time with the Lord and being as involved I am with running the behind the scenes of a Sunday morning, I generally don't retain much from the message. I'm not trying to throw a pity party, but I am simply trying to be open and to express how much different the life I'm leading and the life the monks were leading are. It astonishes me. I want to look at my life and my work and be able to confidently call it "a career of worship," as it should be. We are commanded to do everything we do for the glory of God. Worship is not simply the way in which we praise the Lord through song, but it is every thought we have, every word we say, and every action we take. Through these things, we are either worshipping God or we are worshipping the Lord. I want my life to a career of worship to the Lord.


P.S. I commented on Jessef's and Isabelle's posts.

Comments

  1. Emma Kate PattersonFebruary 8, 2021 at 11:45 PM

    I like that you pointed out that we should be doing everything for the glory of God. I think a lot of times we get busy in life and forget our true purpose and why we are here. It is important for us to remember our true purpose and live everyday for the glory of God.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more