Skip to main content

Are We Living on a Sponge? - Kaitlyn Terry

    In book VII, Augustine starts by trying to wrap his mind around the fact that God has no substance, yet still exists. He takes this concept head-on, something that we still struggle with today. We as a collective don't really understand it, so we largely just try to keep from thinking about it. Augustine kind of does the opposite. He takes it head-on and tries to come to terms with it right then and there. From there he, naturally, dives into several more internal debates and questions. 

    I find one of these particularly notable. He begins to try to understand the existence of evil if all was created by a good God. He compares God to a vast infinite ocean and the earth to a large but finite sponge. This allows the goodness of God to flow completely through the sponge. As he debates the existence of God and evil, he realizes the flaws in his imagery. He seems to focus largely through this book on how he imagines God and how he must not even begin to try to imagine God because he simply cannot be imagined. Augustine seems to take some very revolutionary steps in his debate of what God is and the existence of evil.



I commented on Addison and Abbie's posts.

Comments

  1. Ian BlairFebruary 2, 2021 at 7:30 AM

    I think Augustine realizing that the existence of evil may not even being linked to God in the first place, but him simply allowing it to exist for a time shows that he has grown since his earlier years documented in the earlier books. It's really cool, I think, to see how his thinking mindset evolves from chasing pleasure to chasing answers and truth.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jackson RiddleFebruary 2, 2021 at 9:30 AM

    I commented on this idea that we will never understand God existing without taking up substance in my own blog post, and is something that we likely will never understand. Having grown up Christian it becomes a concept that I no longer question but just accept as fact, because I am unable to contemplate such things; they are simply true to me. Therefore I applaud Augustine for his head-on approach to understanding such concepts; he has tackled concepts I have never attempted to understand.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Not a Hallmark.. NOT A HALLMARK - Clabo

I completely forgot how tragic the relationship between Dido and Aeneas was. The thought that Venus originally caused Dido to fall in love with Aeneas through Cupid for no other reason than to just provide Aeneas and his troops' safety is so aggravating. Venus used Dido and her resources at the ultimate and unfortunate expense of her life. She did not naturally fall in love with him, and she wasn't supposed to in the first place. Everyone knows that Aeneas and the Trojans have to make it to Italy to make their new city/empire, and this most assuredly means that they would not be able to stay in Carthage.  I also think that Juno is to blame for a lot of it, however, because the caused her and Aeneas to end up alone in a cave during a storm. You would think that if Juno cared so much for Carthage that she would not have caused/helped cause the death of the city's queen. This was just overall very unfortunate in all aspects. What are your thoughts and opinions? P.S. I commente...
3 comments
Read more