Skip to main content

The Battle Between the Senses and the Soul~ Madalyn Dillard

    In part 33 of book X in St. Augustine’s Confessions, Augustine expresses his idea of the greediness of his senses. “But I ought not to allow my mind to be paralyzed by the gratification of my senses, which often leads it astray.” (Book X. 33) My take of his words translate them to Augustine having an inward battle of which side of himself to satisfy (or which side should be priority).

    I like to liken this passage with the story of the Allegory of the Cave written by Plato. Evidentially, Plato draws a great line which divides ethereal from mortal. That same line divides us as humans, and we have a constant battle between which side of the line we inhabit. Of course, Christians will say that the priority should be put on the ethereal side of the line; however, it is easier said than done. I believe that since we are in a material (mortal) world, the mortal side of our line has a stronger pull. Therefore, we will need to want the ethereal side in order to crave the satisfaction that comes with it. 

    I might have lost you in the last paragraph, but let me show you from a different standpoint. Think about completing a task whether it be baking, hiking, reading, etc. People can get satisfaction from completing a task by eating the baked good one just made or basking in sweat and glory while looking out onto the view that the mountain you just hiked has to offer. We get satisfaction from practically everything; however, when a task is harder to complete, a person can experience a greater satisfaction. It may take more will-power to get the task done, but the reward is greater nonetheless. 

    You may be wondering why I brought up that scenario. When a Christian chooses to follow their ethereal desires, the reward can be seen as greater or a more permanent reward. With many things, instant gratification is not as permanent as a gratification you work harder for. Even though our mortal senses want instant gratification, we as Christians, must work harder to gratify our ethereal side with following the words of God. 


I commented on Micah and Brooke’s posts. 

Comments

  1. It is important to remember that a lot what Augustine called the soul, is now known as hormones, psychology, biology, etc. (crying, happiness, fear, thinking, …). So much of his ethereal side was actually his mortal side. People do receive greater pleasure after a hard task, but is it because the task is hard, or because the suffering makes the pleasure better in comparison? Happiness in humans seems to stabilize after periods of time due to automatic tolerances to things. There is an analogy for this called the "hedonic treadmill".

    ReplyDelete
  2. Madalyn, I really liked how you compared hiking a mountain to following the 'right' impulses in our lives rather than the 'natural' impulses. Whenever I visited Tennessee, my favorite part of hiking was getting to the top and surveying the bigger picture of what was around me. Going against the flesh/senses and following the spirit is hard as heck sometimes, but once God shows us how far we've come and how hard we fought, the battle becomes all the more special.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...