Skip to main content

Don't Cry, Plot Revenge /////// Isabelle Ferguson

   I appreciate a good villain backstory in every movie, book, show, etc.; so, I can’t help but compare Hrothgar to Grendel’s mother in this situation. I picture Grendel’s mother just going about her evil life in her swamp home. She is under the impression that everything is fine, as she admires her walls- decorated with the weapons of evil creatures of the past. Up until this point, her darling son, Grendel, had been coming home happy. He was full of the carcasses of the fallen warriors of Heorot. Life was pretty good for a she-demon and her evil son. Out of nowhere, her baby boy just crashes into the cave, without an arm and on his death bed. 
    Hrothgar went to sleep with the belief that there was nothing else to fear, and his people were safe. Grendel was bested by Beowulf, and Grendel had been their only problem. Hrothgar is heartbroken when he wakes to find that his dearest counselor and friend has been killed, after they thought their enemies had been vanquished (1325-1326). 
    Beowulf comes to defend Hrothgar again, and the king replies with a sorrowful speech. He wants to mourn because he believes there is no hope. Beowulf’s response to Hrothgar in lines 1384-1396 (after Aeschere’s death) sparked my interest. “’Wise sir, do not grieve. It is always better / to avenge dear ones than to indulge in mourning.” Beowulf is, basically, telling Hrothgar to postpone his pity-party because vengeance feels better than crying. How would this speech not also apply to Grendel's mother? Just as Hrothgar lost someone dear to him, Grendel's mother lost her only son. Just a final thought, the fact that she came to avenge her child makes me think there may be some ounce of good in her. A mother's love is strong, and she clearly cared about her baby.

P.S. I commented on Lily Caswell's and Addison Zanda's posts.

    

Comments

  1. kaitlyn terryFebruary 22, 2021 at 11:09 PM

    I agree! I think Grendel's mother may have been misrepresented a little bit. I'm not saying she wasn't evil at all, but she may not have been so in the wrong here. It's not so out of pocket to assume that she was just as hurt as Hrothgar was and it's definitely understandable that she would take the prize to try to curb her son's humiliation past death.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Micah PowersFebruary 23, 2021 at 7:57 AM

    A mothers love for her child I do believe is one of the strongest loves second only to God's agape love for us. It seems to me the mothers will seek to do some very irrational things in regards to their love for their children. I think this is where the fathers role comes in in marriage. Fathers while they do not seem too show it as much keep handle over the emotional tension in order to act in a way that is most beneficial for the family unit. I think another reason mothers feel more strongly in relation to their children is the immense amount of time and energy they have invested in the nurturing process. From conception to early feeding to early teaching the mother has a higher input in many aspects of the child early development. It would be very interesting to study the possessiveness of a mother relative to their child and factors such as breastfeeding, whether or not they used day care, and how much pre education the mother provided.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Logan TurnerFebruary 23, 2021 at 9:40 AM

    Yeah, I agree with you. Grendel's mother did exactly what any mother would do, so why should she be punished for that? I get it, she is a monster, but she didn't really do anything to Beowulf. I do think she overreacted a bit by snatching Hrothgar's advisor (I forget the name), but aside from that, she didn't really do anything wrong.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.
4 comments
Read more

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....
5 comments
Read more

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...
7 comments
Read more