Skip to main content

Fear of a just judge // Ian Blair

    Well, like-son-like-mother I suppose. The second part of Beowulf is definitely a bit more interesting than the first in my opinion, mainly due to the fact that we see the hero of the story have to adapt to aquatic combat; something that was uncommon in the time period it was written in. This sequel of sorts is what I was anticipating when we read Homer’s Iliad last semester, so it’s a relief that we get some story continuation here. The fight with Grendel’s mother once again hinted at previous stories written by the Greeks and Romans with the sword on the wall of the underwater vault that looked like it was made to slay giants. The decision by the writer of the original tale to keep continuity with the older stories adds a unique dynamic that really helps the world-building of the epic. I find it quite ironic that the only people who really stayed to see if Beowulf would return were the people he traveled with, just goes to show who out of the bunch actually had faith that their hero would finish the job. The faith that the Geats had in Beowulf is not unlike the faith that we are called to have in Jesus; and much like the Geats, when we have unwavering faith we see the influence of God in our lives. An example of this is seen when Beowulf gives credit for the defeat of Grendel’s mother back to God: 

“I barely survived the battle under water. It was hard-fought, a desperate affair that could have gone badly; if God had not helped me, the outcome would have been quick and fatal” (115).


    Beowulf leaning on his own strength is formidable, but slaying God-cursed monsters requires the aid of the God who cursed them in the first place; this detail enforces the lesson the story teaches about having respect for the Lord. It seems as though this theme of leaving the outcome of the fight in the Lord’s hands will eventually see Beowulf defeated. Will this theme continue into part III? I suppose there’s only one way to find out.

 

p.s. I commented on Micah's and Haylee Lynd's posts.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Word Painting in Vesta—Lily Caswell

  Word painting in Weelkes’s As Vesta Was from Latmos Hill Descending is quite interesting. And because that is a really long title, I’m calling it Vesta from now on. Word painting is basically when the melody matches up with the lyrics. So in Vesta, when it says “ascending” and “descending”, there are obviously scales going up and down. The madrigal was written for six voices to sing unaccompanied, so when they start to come together, it matches with the lyrics; so if the lyric says “two by two”, there are only two voices; “three by three” there is another voice added, and so forth. All the parts combine in exclamation before Vesta before it is left “all alone” to the highest soprano. All the way to the end of the piece, word painting continues when shouts of “Long live fair Oriana” with the bass sustaining long notes. Word painting in and of itself is a highly interesting topic because a musician takes the words of a poem or a sonnet and writes a melody line that pertains to cer...
4 comments
Read more

Honor and Gain; Which Do You Seek?

 Pericles.... thanks? I can only imagine that's what the family and friends were thinking after they heard his historic funeral speech honoring the departed. What do I mean? Well, Pericles briefly mentions the men who have fallen at the beginning of his speech, but then goes on to discuss how great Athens is, and how the contributions the city has made to the world are unmatched.. why? I understand that he is also commending the citizens of Athens and empowering them to continue to make their city greater, but I thought this was supposed to be a funeral speech about dead war heroes, not about Athens. Another thing I found interesting is what Pericles said on page five about honor: "For it is only the love of honour that never grows old; and honour it is, not gain, as some would have it, that rejoices the heart of age and helplessness" (Thucydides, page 5). Have you ever watched a show or movie, or read a book, about a duel between two men? There is always an unspoken agre...
Post a Comment
Read more

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more