Skip to main content

Fear of a just judge // Ian Blair

    Well, like-son-like-mother I suppose. The second part of Beowulf is definitely a bit more interesting than the first in my opinion, mainly due to the fact that we see the hero of the story have to adapt to aquatic combat; something that was uncommon in the time period it was written in. This sequel of sorts is what I was anticipating when we read Homer’s Iliad last semester, so it’s a relief that we get some story continuation here. The fight with Grendel’s mother once again hinted at previous stories written by the Greeks and Romans with the sword on the wall of the underwater vault that looked like it was made to slay giants. The decision by the writer of the original tale to keep continuity with the older stories adds a unique dynamic that really helps the world-building of the epic. I find it quite ironic that the only people who really stayed to see if Beowulf would return were the people he traveled with, just goes to show who out of the bunch actually had faith that their hero would finish the job. The faith that the Geats had in Beowulf is not unlike the faith that we are called to have in Jesus; and much like the Geats, when we have unwavering faith we see the influence of God in our lives. An example of this is seen when Beowulf gives credit for the defeat of Grendel’s mother back to God: 

“I barely survived the battle under water. It was hard-fought, a desperate affair that could have gone badly; if God had not helped me, the outcome would have been quick and fatal” (115).


    Beowulf leaning on his own strength is formidable, but slaying God-cursed monsters requires the aid of the God who cursed them in the first place; this detail enforces the lesson the story teaches about having respect for the Lord. It seems as though this theme of leaving the outcome of the fight in the Lord’s hands will eventually see Beowulf defeated. Will this theme continue into part III? I suppose there’s only one way to find out.

 

p.s. I commented on Micah's and Haylee Lynd's posts.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...