Skip to main content

Grendel's Mother, Achilles / Abbie Hedden

 I'm going to say this now. I don't think Grendel's mom was a monster. In the same way one may say Medusa was a monster, I suppose you could claim that Grendel's mom was too... but neither of them truly were. Let's look at the facts. In Beowulf, beginning at line 1258, it says "...Grendel's mother, / monstrous hell-bride, brooded on her wrongs... [after Beowulf killed Grendel] his mother had sallied forth on a savage journey, grief-wracked and ravenous, desperate for revenge." Besides that hell-bride part, all we really have is a grieved mother who lost her son. In modern times, we'd probably sympathize with her. Later on, she ravages the hall of warriors and slaughters many men, taking the hand of her son back with her so that the soldiers no longer had their prize. Okay, maybe murdering isn't like a great thing. But how is she different from Achilles? He slaughtered countless men due to avenge the loss of his husband best friend and he was considered a great hero. Is it because of who she killed - those men were supposed to be the good guys, so whoever killed them was considered bad? Or perhaps, like Medusa, the author of this epic simply wanted her to be seen as evil. What do y'all think?


PS Madalyn Dillard and Hailey Morgan

Comments

  1. ClaboFebruary 22, 2021 at 9:29 PM

    I like your comparisons. I thought along very similar lines as I was writing my blogpost. Good and evil in many of the instances you listed are just relative and most likely determined by what side of the field you are standing on. In most cases, one doesn't have to look hard in order to find things to sympathize with amongst complex antagonists.

    ReplyDelete
  2. kaitlyn terryFebruary 22, 2021 at 11:06 PM

    I guess great minds think alike, because Grendel's mother reminded me slightly of Medusa as well. With Medusa's story specifically, it's hard to see someone villainized for trying to protect themselves. Grendel's mother had a similar motive with avenging her son. I'm truly not sure whether she was actually evil, or just portrayed as such.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

One shall stand, One shall fall // Ian Blair

      I usually have a little introduction into my thoughts about the reading for this week before I start with the actual blog part of my post, but I can't help but think about the bone-chilling realization that awaits us in Book VIII, so my introduction this time will be brief. It is my personal opinion that if people are imperfect, then we are only capable of imperfect systems and societies consequentially. However, this does not mean that we must not aim for the closest system to perfect that we can achieve.      The realization I wrote of earlier is the suggestion by Socrates that tyranny stems from the system we know as democracy. At first I disagreed, it is anarchism that causes  tyrannical reign as a byproduct of fulfilling its purpose of overthrowing the current power and not establishing another system. All anarchism does is create a power vacuum for another power to take over and the cycle repeats itself, right? ...Right? Quic...
1 comment
Read more