Skip to main content

Hildeburh's Conflict // Jackson Riddle

Marriage, or as the priest in the movie The Princess Bride says, "Mawwiage", is a beautiful thing. The joining of two people in love (hopefully) so they can happily live the rest of their lives out together. Marriage in Beowulf is, well, interesting. I bring up marriage in reference to the bard's saga that he sings in lines 1070 to 1158 about the attack in Friesland, where Hnaef, king of the Danes, met his demise. In this tale of vengeance and despair, Hildeburh, a Danish princess, is married to the Frisian king Finn in a marriage meant to bring peace between the feuding countries. I found this tale particularly interesting because the bard explains that among the Danish and Frisian casualties were Hildeburh's Frisian son and her Danish brother Hnaef. Hildeburh had losses on both sides of the battle, both of them blood-kin, and yet she remained impartial to the battle because what else was she to do?

I bring this up because I'm unsure as to where I stand on the whole concept of marriages used as a tool of peace between countries. On the one hand, it makes sense; I give you my daughter, and you basically give me your son, it's a mutual exchange of something held dear to the rulers of each kingdom. But in such cases, are the prince and princesses' opinions on the matter simply ignored? What if the princess had a strong distaste for her newly-wed husband that was then reflected through the exchanges between countries? And in Hildeburh's situation, it must have pained her deeply to see her brother and son clash on the battlefield, a situation that I'm sure was not that uncommon in that era. After experiencing such loss, Hildeburh handled the situation with perfect execution in lines 1115 through 1118: "Then Hildeburh ordered her own son's body be burnt with Hnaef's, the flesh on his bones to sputter and blaze beside his uncle's." By ordering the two bodies be burnt alongside eachother, Hildeburh essentially gave the leaders of the Danish and the Frisian an example of how their alliance should be; side by side, not sword through side (ha that was clever).    

All that to say, such marriages that are solely officiated to bring forth union between nations cause problems like Hildeburh's that could surely be avoided were there a different method of showing peace.


PS: I commented on Kaitlyn Terry and Clabo's posts.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Word Painting in Vesta—Lily Caswell

  Word painting in Weelkes’s As Vesta Was from Latmos Hill Descending is quite interesting. And because that is a really long title, I’m calling it Vesta from now on. Word painting is basically when the melody matches up with the lyrics. So in Vesta, when it says “ascending” and “descending”, there are obviously scales going up and down. The madrigal was written for six voices to sing unaccompanied, so when they start to come together, it matches with the lyrics; so if the lyric says “two by two”, there are only two voices; “three by three” there is another voice added, and so forth. All the parts combine in exclamation before Vesta before it is left “all alone” to the highest soprano. All the way to the end of the piece, word painting continues when shouts of “Long live fair Oriana” with the bass sustaining long notes. Word painting in and of itself is a highly interesting topic because a musician takes the words of a poem or a sonnet and writes a melody line that pertains to cer...
4 comments
Read more

Honor and Gain; Which Do You Seek?

 Pericles.... thanks? I can only imagine that's what the family and friends were thinking after they heard his historic funeral speech honoring the departed. What do I mean? Well, Pericles briefly mentions the men who have fallen at the beginning of his speech, but then goes on to discuss how great Athens is, and how the contributions the city has made to the world are unmatched.. why? I understand that he is also commending the citizens of Athens and empowering them to continue to make their city greater, but I thought this was supposed to be a funeral speech about dead war heroes, not about Athens. Another thing I found interesting is what Pericles said on page five about honor: "For it is only the love of honour that never grows old; and honour it is, not gain, as some would have it, that rejoices the heart of age and helplessness" (Thucydides, page 5). Have you ever watched a show or movie, or read a book, about a duel between two men? There is always an unspoken agre...
Post a Comment
Read more

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more