Skip to main content

It's the thought that counts... // Ian Blair

     It is no surprise that music is consistently highly regarding among the various civilizations that have rose up and fallen throughout the course of the story of history, but Augustine really seems to take issue with a certain aspect of the worship experience in the Catholic Church during his day that I simply could not pass up the chance to touch on: the aspect of musical glorification. Augustine in his Confessions details his qualms with how he individually treats music in the worship services the Catholic Church performs, mainly addressing the fact that he believes that he is afraid of enjoying the instrumental or the melody or harmonizations more than the deeper message the hymn is trying to convey. I think where he gets a bit inside his own head (enneagram 1 anyone?) is when he says:

". . . I must allow it a position of some honor in my heart, and I find it difficult to assign it to its proper place. For sometimes I feel that I treat it with more on her than it deserves." (Augustine 238-33). 

He is trying to discern where exactly he should put worship music in his view of what is good or evil, and it struggling to identify the nature of the music. We see this struggle further in the passage when Augustine relents that he can be harsh, and thereby misguided, in his judgements (238). Augustine read a bit of Philosophy that was still around during his time, so I think using Aristotle's philosophy here can clear some of the mental stalemate up. Recall Aristotle in his Nicomachean Ethics with his idea of the golden mean?

"Thus a master of any art avoids excess and defect, but seeks the intermediate and chooses this- the intermediate not in the object but relatively to us." (Aristotle, 16-17). 

Augustine, instead of picking a category of good or evil to place music under, must take the approach of looking at the music as a way to glorify God, and choose simply not to focus more on how the music sounds versus the lyrical meaning. Music in of itself is neither inherently evil or good, because the piece is defined by the message it brings into fruition.


p.s. I commented on Jessef's and Leanne's posts.

Comments

  1. Great job, Ian. Music is something that has been important throughout history (and rightfully so). The problem is when music becomes higher than God in our lives. Music should be a tool to worship God, not an idol. That is why I believe music is highly glorified because it causes us to not focus on the bad parts in our lives, but we should be depending on God in times of desperation.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is an interesting thought. I think it would be interesting to hear Augustine’s thought on how prominent secular music is and if we should still focus on music in the church. Because, like you said, for music to be good, in Augustine’s view, it needs to be focused on God. So, for him to see the influence secular music has on music as a whole, it would worry Augustine and make him contemplate if music should be allowed in modern worship.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Not a Hallmark.. NOT A HALLMARK - Clabo

I completely forgot how tragic the relationship between Dido and Aeneas was. The thought that Venus originally caused Dido to fall in love with Aeneas through Cupid for no other reason than to just provide Aeneas and his troops' safety is so aggravating. Venus used Dido and her resources at the ultimate and unfortunate expense of her life. She did not naturally fall in love with him, and she wasn't supposed to in the first place. Everyone knows that Aeneas and the Trojans have to make it to Italy to make their new city/empire, and this most assuredly means that they would not be able to stay in Carthage.  I also think that Juno is to blame for a lot of it, however, because the caused her and Aeneas to end up alone in a cave during a storm. You would think that if Juno cared so much for Carthage that she would not have caused/helped cause the death of the city's queen. This was just overall very unfortunate in all aspects. What are your thoughts and opinions? P.S. I commente...