Skip to main content

Less of a Thought, More of a Brainstorm - Jamie Peters

Whenever I read this last semester for Brit Lit, I was really interested in writing a research paper discussing the interjections of the sides stories by the poets. I never got around to it in there, so I am going to do it here! What I want to know is who each character in the Finnsburg Episode (the second story for those of you who don't have that annotation) is supposed to represent in the bard's eyes. There are three main characters discussed, Finn, Hildeburh, and Hengest. Both Hildeburh's brother and son, who are Danes, die to the hands of Finn's men, and the successor of the Danes, Hengest, quickly brings justice upon those who murdered them. After a winter of recieving tributes from Finn because of his loss, Hengest's "...longing woke 

in the cooped-up exile for a voyage home - 

but more for vengeance, some way of bringing 

things to a head..." (1138-1141)

Inevitably, Hengest recieves what he thinks is the weregyld, or the blood-price, for the bother and son of Hildeburh by killing Finn in is own house and returning Hildeburh to her kin (1146-1158).

Based on the summary above, the order of events still confuses me; I do think, however, that I can attribute who the bard thinks each person is. Hilderburh represents Hrothgar, the man under much sorrow because of all the people he has lost. Finn I think is supposed to represent Grendel because of the murder of the brother and son and the fact that he is the king of the Frisians, the inherent enemy of the Danes. That leaves Hengest as Beowulf, the man that brought vengeance upon the murderer. 

Thank you for letting me use this space to sort out my thoughts on this. Do you think that I got the characters right?


P.S. I commented on Abigail's and Braylan's posts.

Comments

  1. Lily CaswellFebruary 22, 2021 at 9:22 PM

    I definitely can see it after reading your post, Jamie. I’m not exactly sure what I can add to this because there’s not really anything to add other than the fact that the timeline of the story is a little bit different like you mentioned but sometimes that can be just poetic license rather than the way it might have actually happened.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.
4 comments
Read more

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....
5 comments
Read more

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...
7 comments
Read more